2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
==============
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Architecture
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
:term:`Ceph` uniquely delivers **object, block, and file storage** in one
|
|
|
|
|
unified system. Ceph is highly reliable, easy to manage, and free. The power of
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph can transform your company's IT infrastructure and your ability to manage
|
|
|
|
|
vast amounts of data. Ceph delivers extraordinary scalability–thousands of
|
|
|
|
|
clients accessing petabytes to exabytes of data. A :term:`Ceph Node` leverages
|
|
|
|
|
commodity hardware and intelligent daemons, and a :term:`Ceph Storage Cluster`
|
|
|
|
|
accommodates large numbers of nodes, which communicate with each other to
|
|
|
|
|
replicate and redistribute data dynamically. A :term:`Ceph Monitor` can also be
|
|
|
|
|
placed into a cluster of Ceph monitors to oversee the Ceph nodes in the Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
Storage Cluster (a monitor cluster ensures high availability).
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. image:: images/stack.png
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The Ceph Storage Cluster
|
|
|
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph provides an infinitely scalable :term:`Ceph Storage Cluster` based upon
|
|
|
|
|
:abbr:`RADOS (Reliable Autonomic Distributed Object Store)`, which you can read
|
|
|
|
|
about in `RADOS - A Scalable, Reliable Storage Service for Petabyte-scale
|
|
|
|
|
Storage Clusters`_. Storage cluster clients and each :term:`Ceph OSD Daemon` use
|
|
|
|
|
the CRUSH algorithm to efficiently compute information about data location,
|
|
|
|
|
instead of having to depend on a central lookup table. Ceph's high-level
|
|
|
|
|
features include providing a native interface to the Ceph Storage Cluster via
|
|
|
|
|
``librados``, and a number of service interfaces built on top of ``librados``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa:: +---------------+ +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| OSDs | | Monitors |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+ +---------------+
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Storing Data
|
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ceph Storage Cluster receives data from :term:`Ceph Clients`--whether it
|
|
|
|
|
comes through a :term:`Ceph Block Device`, :term:`Ceph Object Storage`, the
|
|
|
|
|
:term:`Ceph Filesystem` or a custom implementation you create using
|
|
|
|
|
``librados``--and it stores the data as objects. Each object corresponds to a
|
|
|
|
|
file in a filesystem, which is stored on an :term:`Object Storage Device`. Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
OSD Daemons handle the read/write operations on the storage disks.
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa:: /-----\ +-----+ +-----+
|
|
|
|
|
| obj |------>| {d} |------>| {s} |
|
|
|
|
|
\-----/ +-----+ +-----+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Object File Disk
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph OSD Daemons store all data as objects in a flat namespace (e.g., no
|
|
|
|
|
hierarchy of directories). An object has an identifier, binary data, and
|
|
|
|
|
metadata consisting of a set of name/value pairs. The semantics are completely
|
|
|
|
|
up to :term:`Ceph Clients`. For example, CephFS uses metadata to store file
|
|
|
|
|
attributes such as the file owner, created date, last modified date, and so
|
|
|
|
|
forth.
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa:: /------+------------------------------+----------------\
|
|
|
|
|
| ID | Binary Data | Metadata |
|
|
|
|
|
+------+------------------------------+----------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| 1234 | 0101010101010100110101010010 | name1 = value1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| | 0101100001010100110101010010 | name2 = value2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| | 0101100001010100110101010010 | nameN = valueN |
|
|
|
|
|
\------+------------------------------+----------------/
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. note:: An object ID is unique across the entire cluster, not just the local
|
|
|
|
|
filesystem.
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; high availability, scalability
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Scalability and High Availability
|
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
In traditional architectures, clients talk to a centralized component (e.g., a
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
gateway, broker, API, facade, etc.), which acts as a single point of entry to a
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
complex subsystem. This imposes a limit to both performance and scalability,
|
|
|
|
|
while introducing a single point of failure (i.e., if the centralized component
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
goes down, the whole system goes down, too).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph eliminates the centralized gateway to enable clients to interact with
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph OSD Daemons directly. Ceph OSD Daemons create object replicas on other
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Nodes to ensure data safety and high availabilty. Ceph also uses a cluster
|
|
|
|
|
of monitors to ensure high availability. To eliminate centralization, Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
uses an algorithm called CRUSH.
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: CRUSH; architecture
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
CRUSH Introduction
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Clients and Ceph OSD Daemons both use the :abbr:`CRUSH (Controlled
|
|
|
|
|
Replication Under Scalable Hashing)` algorithm to efficiently compute
|
|
|
|
|
information about data containers on demand, instead of having to depend on a
|
|
|
|
|
central lookup table. CRUSH provides a better data management mechanism compared
|
|
|
|
|
to older approaches, and enables massive scale by cleanly distributing the work
|
|
|
|
|
to all the clients and OSD daemons in the cluster. CRUSH uses intelligent data
|
|
|
|
|
replication to ensure resiliency, which is better suited to hyper-scale storage.
|
|
|
|
|
The following sections provide additional details on how CRUSH works. For a
|
|
|
|
|
detailed discussion of CRUSH, see `CRUSH - Controlled, Scalable, Decentralized
|
|
|
|
|
Placement of Replicated Data`_.
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; cluster map
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cluster Map
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph depends upon Ceph Clients and Ceph OSD Daemons having knowledge of the
|
|
|
|
|
cluster topology, which is inclusive of 5 maps collectively referred to as the
|
|
|
|
|
"Cluster Map":
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. **The Monitor Map:** Contains the cluster ``fsid``, the position, name
|
|
|
|
|
address and port of each monitor. It also indicates the current epoch,
|
|
|
|
|
when the map was created, and the last time it changed. To view a monitor
|
|
|
|
|
map, execute ``ceph mon dump``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
#. **The OSD Map:** Contains the cluster ``fsid``, when the map was created and
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
last modified, a list of pools, replica sizes, PG numbers, a list of OSDs
|
|
|
|
|
and their status (e.g., ``up``, ``in``). To view an OSD map, execute
|
|
|
|
|
``ceph osd dump``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. **The PG Map:** Contains the PG version, its time stamp, the last OSD
|
|
|
|
|
map epoch, the full ratios, and details on each placement group such as
|
|
|
|
|
the PG ID, the `Up Set`, the `Acting Set`, the state of the PG (e.g.,
|
|
|
|
|
``active + clean``), and data usage statistics for each pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. **The CRUSH Map:** Contains a list of storage devices, the failure domain
|
|
|
|
|
hierarchy (e.g., device, host, rack, row, room, etc.), and rules for
|
|
|
|
|
traversing the hierarchy when storing data. To view a CRUSH map, execute
|
|
|
|
|
``ceph osd getcrushmap -o {filename}``; then, decompile it by executing
|
|
|
|
|
``crushtool -d {comp-crushmap-filename} -o {decomp-crushmap-filename}``.
|
|
|
|
|
You can view the decompiled map in a text editor or with ``cat``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. **The MDS Map:** Contains the current MDS map epoch, when the map was
|
|
|
|
|
created, and the last time it changed. It also contains the pool for
|
|
|
|
|
storing metadata, a list of metadata servers, and which metadata servers
|
|
|
|
|
are ``up`` and ``in``. To view an MDS map, execute ``ceph mds dump``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Each map maintains an iterative history of its operating state changes. Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
Monitors maintain a master copy of the cluster map including the cluster
|
|
|
|
|
members, state, changes, and the overall health of the Ceph Storage Cluster.
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: high availability; monitor architecture
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
High Availability Monitors
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Before Ceph Clients can read or write data, they must contact a Ceph Monitor
|
|
|
|
|
to obtain the most recent copy of the cluster map. A Ceph Storage Cluster
|
|
|
|
|
can operate with a single monitor; however, this introduces a single
|
|
|
|
|
point of failure (i.e., if the monitor goes down, Ceph Clients cannot
|
|
|
|
|
read or write data).
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
For added reliability and fault tolerance, Ceph supports a cluster of monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
In a cluster of monitors, latency and other faults can cause one or more
|
|
|
|
|
monitors to fall behind the current state of the cluster. For this reason, Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
must have agreement among various monitor instances regarding the state of the
|
|
|
|
|
cluster. Ceph always uses a majority of monitors (e.g., 1, 2:3, 3:5, 4:6, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
and the `Paxos`_ algorithm to establish a consensus among the monitors about the
|
|
|
|
|
current state of the cluster.
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
For details on configuring monitors, see the `Monitor Config Reference`_.
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; high availability authentication
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
High Availability Authentication
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph clients can authenticate users with Ceph Monitors, Ceph OSD Daemons and
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Metadata Servers, using Ceph's Kerberos-like ``cephx`` protocol.
|
|
|
|
|
Authenticated users gain authorization to read, write and execute Ceph commands.
|
|
|
|
|
The Cephx authentication system avoids a single point of failure to ensure
|
|
|
|
|
scalability and high availability. For details on Cephx and how it differs
|
|
|
|
|
from Kerberos, see `Ceph Authentication and Authorization`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; smart daemons and scalability
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smart Daemons Enable Hyperscale
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In many clustered architectures, the primary purpose of cluster membership is
|
|
|
|
|
so that a centralized interface knows which nodes it can access. Then the
|
|
|
|
|
centralized interface provides services to the client through a double
|
|
|
|
|
dispatch--which is a **huge** bottleneck at the petabyte-to-exabyte scale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph elminates the bottleneck: Ceph's OSD Daemons AND Ceph Clients are cluster
|
|
|
|
|
aware. Like Ceph clients, each Ceph OSD Daemon knows about other Ceph OSD
|
|
|
|
|
Daemons in the cluster. This enables Ceph OSD Daemons to interact directly with
|
|
|
|
|
other Ceph OSD Daemons and Ceph monitors. Additionally, it enables Ceph Clients
|
|
|
|
|
to interact directly with Ceph OSD Daemons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ability of Ceph Clients, Ceph Monitors and Ceph OSD Daemons to interact with
|
|
|
|
|
each other means that Ceph OSD Daemons can utilize the CPU and RAM of the Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
nodes to easily perform tasks that would bog down a centralized server. The
|
|
|
|
|
ability to leverage this computing power leads to several major benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. **OSDs Service Clients Directly:** Since any network device has a limit to
|
|
|
|
|
the number of concurrent connections it can support, a centralized system
|
|
|
|
|
has a low physical limit at high scales. By enabling Ceph Clients to contact
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph OSD Daemons directly, Ceph increases both performance and total system
|
|
|
|
|
capacity simultaneously, while removing a single point of failure. Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
Clients can maintain a session when they need to, and with a particular Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
OSD Daemon instead of a centralized server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. **OSD Membership and Status**: Ceph OSD Daemons join a cluster and report
|
|
|
|
|
on their status. At the lowest level, the Ceph OSD Daemon status is ``up``
|
|
|
|
|
or ``down`` reflecting whether or not it is running and able to service
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Client requests. If a Ceph OSD Daemon is ``down`` and ``in`` the Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
Storage Cluster, this status may indicate the failure of the Ceph OSD
|
|
|
|
|
Daemon. If a Ceph OSD Daemon is not running (e.g., it crashes), the Ceph OSD
|
|
|
|
|
Daemon cannot notify the Ceph Monitor that it is ``down``. The Ceph Monitor
|
|
|
|
|
can ping a Ceph OSD Daemon periodically to ensure that it is running.
|
|
|
|
|
However, Ceph also empowers Ceph OSD Daemons to determine if a neighboring
|
|
|
|
|
OSD is ``down``, to update the cluster map and to report it to the Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
monitor(s). This means that Ceph monitors can remain light weight processes.
|
|
|
|
|
See `Monitoring OSDs`_ and `Heartbeats`_ for additional details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. **Data Scrubbing:** As part of maintaining data consistency and cleanliness,
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph OSD Daemons can scrub objects within placement groups. That is, Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
OSD Daemons can compare object metadata in one placement group with its
|
|
|
|
|
replicas in placement groups stored on other OSDs. Scrubbing (usually
|
|
|
|
|
performed daily) catches bugs or filesystem errors. Ceph OSD Daemons also
|
|
|
|
|
perform deeper scrubbing by comparing data in objects bit-for-bit. Deep
|
|
|
|
|
scrubbing (usually performed weekly) finds bad sectors on a drive that
|
|
|
|
|
weren't apparent in a light scrub. See `Data Scrubbing`_ for details on
|
|
|
|
|
configuring scrubbing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. **Replication:** Like Ceph Clients, Ceph OSD Daemons use the CRUSH
|
|
|
|
|
algorithm, but the Ceph OSD Daemon uses it to compute where replicas of
|
|
|
|
|
objects should be stored (and for rebalancing). In a typical write scenario,
|
|
|
|
|
a client uses the CRUSH algorithm to compute where to store an object, maps
|
|
|
|
|
the object to a pool and placement group, then looks at the CRUSH map to
|
|
|
|
|
identify the primary OSD for the placement group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The client writes the object to the identified placement group in the
|
|
|
|
|
primary OSD. Then, the primary OSD with its own copy of the CRUSH map
|
|
|
|
|
identifies the secondary and tertiary OSDs for replication purposes, and
|
|
|
|
|
replicates the object to the appropriate placement groups in the secondary
|
|
|
|
|
and tertiary OSDs (as many OSDs as additional replicas), and responds to the
|
|
|
|
|
client once it has confirmed the object was stored successfully.
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa::
|
|
|
|
|
+----------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Client |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
+----------+
|
|
|
|
|
* ^
|
|
|
|
|
Write (1) | | Ack (6)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
v *
|
|
|
|
|
+-------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Primary OSD |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
+-------------+
|
|
|
|
|
* ^ ^ *
|
|
|
|
|
Write (2) | | | | Write (3)
|
|
|
|
|
+------+ | | +------+
|
|
|
|
|
| +------+ +------+ |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Ack (4) Ack (5)| |
|
|
|
|
|
v * * v
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+ +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Secondary OSD | | Tertiary OSD |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+ +---------------+
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
With the ability to perform data replication, Ceph OSD Daemons relieve Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
clients from that duty, while ensuring high data availability and data safety.
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Dynamic Cluster Management
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
In the `Scalability and High Availability`_ section, we explained how Ceph uses
|
|
|
|
|
CRUSH, cluster awareness and intelligent daemons to scale and maintain high
|
|
|
|
|
availability. Key to Ceph's design is the autonomous, self-healing, and
|
|
|
|
|
intelligent Ceph OSD Daemon. Let's take a deeper look at how CRUSH works to
|
|
|
|
|
enable modern cloud storage infrastructures to place data, rebalance the cluster
|
|
|
|
|
and recover from faults dynamically.
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; pools
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
About Pools
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ceph storage system supports the notion of 'Pools', which are logical
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
partitions for storing objects. Pools set the following parameters:
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
- Ownership/Access to Objects
|
|
|
|
|
- The Number of Object Replicas
|
|
|
|
|
- The Number of Placement Groups, and
|
|
|
|
|
- The CRUSH Ruleset to Use.
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph Clients retrieve a `Cluster Map`_ from a Ceph Monitor, and write objects to
|
|
|
|
|
pools. The pool's ``size`` or number of replicas, the CRUSH ruleset and the
|
|
|
|
|
number of placement groups determine how Ceph will place the data.
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa::
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+ Retrieves +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Client |------------>| Cluster Map |
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+ +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v Writes
|
|
|
|
|
/-----\
|
|
|
|
|
| obj |
|
|
|
|
|
\-----/
|
|
|
|
|
| To
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+ +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Pool |---------->| CRUSH Ruleset |
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+ Selects +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index: architecture; placement group mapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Mapping PGs to OSDs
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each pool has a number of placement groups. CRUSH maps PGs to OSDs dynamically.
|
|
|
|
|
When a Ceph Client stores objects, CRUSH will map each object to a placement
|
|
|
|
|
group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mapping objects to placement groups creates a layer of indirection between the
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph OSD Daemon and the Ceph Client. The Ceph Storage Cluster must be able to
|
|
|
|
|
grow (or shrink) and rebalance where it stores objects dynamically. If the Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
Client "knew" which Ceph OSD Daemon had which object, that would create a tight
|
|
|
|
|
coupling between the Ceph Client and the Ceph OSD Daemon. Instead, the CRUSH
|
|
|
|
|
algorithm maps each object to a placement group and then maps each placement
|
|
|
|
|
group to one or more Ceph OSD Daemons. This layer of indirection allows Ceph to
|
|
|
|
|
rebalance dynamically when new Ceph OSD Daemons and the underlying OSD devices
|
|
|
|
|
come online. The following diagram depicts how CRUSH maps objects to placement
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
groups, and placement groups to OSDs.
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa::
|
|
|
|
|
/-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\ /-----\
|
|
|
|
|
| obj | | obj | | obj | | obj | | obj |
|
|
|
|
|
\-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/ \-----/
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+--------+ +---+----+
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
v v
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------------------+ +-----------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Placement Group #1 | | Placement Group #2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------------------+ +-----------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| +-----------------------+---+
|
|
|
|
|
+------+------+-------------+ |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
v v v v
|
|
|
|
|
/----------\ /----------\ /----------\ /----------\
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| OSD #1 | | OSD #2 | | OSD #3 | | OSD #4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
\----------/ \----------/ \----------/ \----------/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With a copy of the cluster map and the CRUSH algorithm, the client can compute
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
exactly which OSD to use when reading or writing a particular object.
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; calculating PG IDs
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculating PG IDs
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
When a Ceph Client binds to a Ceph Monitor, it retrieves the latest copy of the
|
|
|
|
|
`Cluster Map`_. With the cluster map, the client knows about all of the monitors,
|
|
|
|
|
OSDs, and metadata servers in the cluster. **However, it doesn't know anything
|
|
|
|
|
about object locations.**
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. epigraph::
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Object locations get computed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only input required by the client is the object ID and the pool.
|
|
|
|
|
It's simple: Ceph stores data in named pools (e.g., "liverpool"). When a client
|
|
|
|
|
wants to store a named object (e.g., "john," "paul," "george," "ringo", etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
it calculates a placement group using the object name, a hash code, the
|
|
|
|
|
number of OSDs in the cluster and the pool name. Ceph clients use the following
|
|
|
|
|
steps to compute PG IDs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. The client inputs the pool ID and the object ID. (e.g., pool = "liverpool"
|
|
|
|
|
and object-id = "john")
|
|
|
|
|
#. CRUSH takes the object ID and hashes it.
|
|
|
|
|
#. CRUSH calculates the hash modulo the number of OSDs. (e.g., ``0x58``) to get
|
|
|
|
|
a PG ID.
|
|
|
|
|
#. CRUSH gets the pool ID given the pool name (e.g., "liverpool" = ``4``)
|
|
|
|
|
#. CRUSH prepends the pool ID to the pool ID to the PG ID (e.g., ``4.0x58``).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computing object locations is much faster than performing object location query
|
|
|
|
|
over a chatty session. The :abbr:`CRUSH (Controlled Replication Under Scalable
|
|
|
|
|
Hashing)` algorithm allows a client to compute where objects *should* be stored,
|
|
|
|
|
and enables the client to contact the primary OSD to store or retrieve the
|
|
|
|
|
objects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; PG Peering
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peering and Sets
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In previous sections, we noted that Ceph OSD Daemons check each other's
|
|
|
|
|
heartbeats and report back to the Ceph Monitor. Another thing Ceph OSD daemons
|
|
|
|
|
do is called 'peering', which is the process of bringing all of the OSDs that
|
|
|
|
|
store a Placement Group (PG) into agreement about the state of all of the
|
|
|
|
|
objects (and their metadata) in that PG. In fact, Ceph OSD Daemons `Report
|
|
|
|
|
Peering Failure`_ to the Ceph Monitors. Peering issues usually resolve
|
|
|
|
|
themselves; however, if the problem persists, you may need to refer to the
|
|
|
|
|
`Troubleshooting Peering Failure`_ section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. Note:: Agreeing on the state does not mean that the PGs have the latest contents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ceph Storage Cluster was designed to store at least two copies of an object
|
|
|
|
|
(i.e., ``size = 2``), which is the minimum requirement for data safety. For high
|
|
|
|
|
availability, a Ceph Storage Cluster should store more than two copies of an object
|
|
|
|
|
(e.g., ``size = 3`` and ``min size = 2``) so that it can continue to run in a
|
|
|
|
|
``degraded`` state while maintaining data safety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Referring back to the diagram in `Smart Daemons Enable Hyperscale`_, we do not
|
|
|
|
|
name the Ceph OSD Daemons specifically (e.g., ``osd.0``, ``osd.1``, etc.), but
|
|
|
|
|
rather refer to them as *Primary*, *Secondary*, and so forth. By convention,
|
|
|
|
|
the *Primary* is the first OSD in the *Acting Set*, and is responsible for
|
|
|
|
|
coordinating the peering process for each placement group where it acts as
|
|
|
|
|
the *Primary*, and is the **ONLY** OSD that that will accept client-initiated
|
|
|
|
|
writes to objects for a given placement group where it acts as the *Primary*.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a series of OSDs are responsible for a placement group, that series of
|
|
|
|
|
OSDs, we refer to them as an *Acting Set*. An *Acting Set* may refer to the Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
OSD Daemons that are currently responsible for the placement group, or the Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
OSD Daemons that were responsible for a particular placement group as of some
|
|
|
|
|
epoch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ceph OSD daemons that are part of an *Acting Set* may not always be ``up``.
|
|
|
|
|
When an OSD in the *Acting Set* is ``up``, it is part of the *Up Set*. The *Up
|
|
|
|
|
Set* is an important distinction, because Ceph can remap PGs to other Ceph OSD
|
|
|
|
|
Daemons when an OSD fails.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. note:: In an *Acting Set* for a PG containing ``osd.25``, ``osd.32`` and
|
|
|
|
|
``osd.61``, the first OSD, ``osd.25``, is the *Primary*. If that OSD fails,
|
|
|
|
|
the Secondary, ``osd.32``, becomes the *Primary*, and ``osd.25`` will be
|
|
|
|
|
removed from the *Up Set*.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; Rebalancing
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rebalancing
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you add a Ceph OSD Daemon to a Ceph Storage Cluster, the cluster map gets
|
|
|
|
|
updated with the new OSD. Referring back to `Calculating PG IDs`_, this changes
|
|
|
|
|
the cluster map. Consequently, it changes object placement, because it changes
|
|
|
|
|
an input for the calculations. The following diagram depicts the rebalancing
|
|
|
|
|
process (albeit rather crudely, since it is substantially less impactful with
|
|
|
|
|
large clusters) where some, but not all of the PGs migrate from existing OSDs
|
|
|
|
|
(OSD 1, and OSD 2) to the new OSD (OSD 3). Even when rebalancing, CRUSH is
|
|
|
|
|
stable. Many of the placement groups remain in their original configuration,
|
|
|
|
|
and each OSD gets some added capacity, so there are no load spikes on the
|
|
|
|
|
new OSD after rebalancing is complete.
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-04 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa::
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
+--------+ +--------+
|
|
|
|
|
Before | OSD 1 | | OSD 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+ +--------+
|
|
|
|
|
| PG #1 | | PG #6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| PG #2 | | PG #7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| PG #3 | | PG #8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| PG #4 | | PG #9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| PG #5 | | PG #10 |
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+ +--------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+
|
|
|
|
|
After | OSD 1 | | OSD 2 | | OSD 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+
|
|
|
|
|
| PG #1 | | PG #7 | | PG #3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| PG #2 | | PG #8 | | PG #6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| PG #4 | | PG #10 | | PG #9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| PG #5 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; Data Scrubbing
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Data Consistency
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of maintaining data consistency and cleanliness, Ceph OSDs can also
|
|
|
|
|
scrub objects within placement groups. That is, Ceph OSDs can compare object
|
|
|
|
|
metadata in one placement group with its replicas in placement groups stored in
|
|
|
|
|
other OSDs. Scrubbing (usually performed daily) catches OSD bugs or filesystem
|
|
|
|
|
errors. OSDs can also perform deeper scrubbing by comparing data in objects
|
|
|
|
|
bit-for-bit. Deep scrubbing (usually performed weekly) finds bad sectors on a
|
|
|
|
|
disk that weren't apparent in a light scrub.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See `Data Scrubbing`_ for details on configuring scrubbing.
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: Extensibility, Ceph Classes
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extending Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
You can extend Ceph by creating shared object classes called 'Ceph Classes'.
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph loads ``.so`` classes stored in the ``osd class dir`` directory dynamically
|
|
|
|
|
(i.e., ``$libdir/rados-classes`` by default). When you implement a class, you
|
|
|
|
|
can create new object methods that have the ability to call the native methods
|
|
|
|
|
in the Ceph Object Store, or other class methods you incorporate via libraries
|
|
|
|
|
or create yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On writes, Ceph Classes can call native or class methods, perform any series of
|
|
|
|
|
operations on the inbound data and generate a resulting write transaction that
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph will apply atomically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On reads, Ceph Classes can call native or class methods, perform any series of
|
|
|
|
|
operations on the outbound data and return the data to the client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. topic:: Ceph Class Example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Ceph class for a content management system that presents pictures of a
|
|
|
|
|
particular size and aspect ratio could take an inbound bitmap image, crop it
|
|
|
|
|
to a particular aspect ratio, resize it and embed an invisible copyright or
|
|
|
|
|
watermark to help protect the intellectual property; then, save the
|
|
|
|
|
resulting bitmap image to the object store.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See ``src/objclass/objclass.h``, ``src/fooclass.cc`` and ``src/barclass`` for
|
|
|
|
|
exemplary implementations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
|
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Storage Clusters are dynamic--like a living organism. Whereas, many storage
|
|
|
|
|
appliances do not fully utilize the CPU and RAM of a typical commodity server,
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph does. From heartbeats, to peering, to rebalancing the cluster or
|
|
|
|
|
recovering from faults, Ceph offloads work from clients (and from a centralized
|
|
|
|
|
gateway which doesn't exist in the Ceph architecture) and uses the computing
|
|
|
|
|
power of the OSDs to perform the work. When referring to `Hardware
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendations`_ and the `Network Config Reference`_, be cognizant of the
|
|
|
|
|
foregoing concepts to understand how Ceph utilizes computing resources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: Ceph Protocol, librados
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Protocol
|
|
|
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Clients use the native protocol for interacting with the Ceph Storage
|
|
|
|
|
Cluster. Ceph packages this functionality into the ``librados`` library so that
|
|
|
|
|
you can create your own custom Ceph Clients. The following diagram depicts the
|
|
|
|
|
basic architecture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa::
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Ceph Storage Cluster Protocol |
|
|
|
|
|
| (librados) |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+ +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| OSDs | | Monitors |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+ +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Native Protocol and ``librados``
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modern applications need a simple object storage interface with asynchronous
|
|
|
|
|
communication capability. The Ceph Storage Cluster provides a simple object
|
|
|
|
|
storage interface with asynchronous communication capability. The interface
|
|
|
|
|
provides direct, parallel access to objects throughout the cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
- Pool Operations
|
|
|
|
|
- Snapshots and Copy-on-write Cloning
|
|
|
|
|
- Read/Write Objects
|
|
|
|
|
- Create or Remove
|
|
|
|
|
- Entire Object or Byte Range
|
|
|
|
|
- Append or Truncate
|
|
|
|
|
- Create/Set/Get/Remove XATTRs
|
|
|
|
|
- Create/Set/Get/Remove Key/Value Pairs
|
|
|
|
|
- Compound operations and dual-ack semantics
|
|
|
|
|
- Object Classes
|
2013-04-23 04:02:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; watch/notify
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Object Watch/Notify
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A client can register a persistent interest with an object and keep a session to
|
|
|
|
|
the primary OSD open. The client can send a notification message and payload to
|
|
|
|
|
all watchers and receive notification when the watchers receive the
|
|
|
|
|
notification. This enables a client to use any object a
|
|
|
|
|
synchronization/communication channel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa:: +----------+ +----------+ +----------+ +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Client 1 | | Client 2 | | Client 3 | | OSD:Object ID |
|
|
|
|
|
+----------+ +----------+ +----------+ +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Watch Object | |
|
|
|
|
|
|--------------------------------------------------->|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|<---------------------------------------------------|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Ack/Commit | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Watch Object | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |---------------------------------->|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |<----------------------------------|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Ack/Commit | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | Watch Object |
|
|
|
|
|
| | |----------------->|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | |<-----------------|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | Ack/Commit |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Notify | |
|
|
|
|
|
|--------------------------------------------------->|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|<---------------------------------------------------|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Notify | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |<----------------------------------|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Notify | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | |<-----------------|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | Notify |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Ack | |
|
|
|
|
|
|----------------+---------------------------------->|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Ack | |
|
|
|
|
|
| +---------------------------------->|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | Ack |
|
|
|
|
|
| | |----------------->|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|<---------------+----------------+------------------|
|
|
|
|
|
| Complete
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; Striping
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data Striping
|
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage devices have throughput limitations, which impact performance and
|
|
|
|
|
scalability. So storage systems often support `striping`_--storing sequential
|
|
|
|
|
pieces of information across across multiple storage devices--to increase
|
|
|
|
|
throughput and performance. The most common form of data striping comes from
|
|
|
|
|
`RAID`_. The RAID type most similar to Ceph's striping is `RAID 0`_, or a
|
|
|
|
|
'striped volume.' Ceph's striping offers the throughput of RAID 0 striping,
|
|
|
|
|
the reliability of n-way RAID mirroring and faster recovery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph provides three types of clients: Ceph Block Device, Ceph Filesystem, and
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Object Storage. A Ceph Client converts its data from the representation
|
|
|
|
|
format it provides to its users (a block device image, RESTful objects, CephFS
|
|
|
|
|
filesystem directories) into objects for storage in the Ceph Storage Cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. tip:: The objects Ceph stores in the Ceph Storage Cluster are not striped.
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Object Storage, Ceph Block Device, and the Ceph Filesystem stripe their
|
|
|
|
|
data over multiple Ceph Storage Cluster objects. Ceph Clients that write
|
|
|
|
|
directly to the Ceph Storage Cluster via ``librados`` must perform the the
|
|
|
|
|
striping (and parallel I/O) for themselves to obtain these benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The simplest Ceph striping format involves a stripe count of 1 object. Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
Clients write stripe units to a Ceph Storage Cluster object until the object is
|
|
|
|
|
at its maximum capacity, and then create another object for additional stripes
|
|
|
|
|
of data. The simplest form of striping may be sufficient for small block device
|
|
|
|
|
images, S3 or Swift objects and CephFS files. However, this simple form doesn't
|
|
|
|
|
take maximum advantage of Ceph's ability to distribute data across placement
|
|
|
|
|
groups, and consequently doesn't improve performance very much. The following
|
|
|
|
|
diagram depicts the simplest form of striping:
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa::
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Client Data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Format |
|
|
|
|
|
| cCCC |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--------+-------+
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
v v
|
|
|
|
|
/-----------\ /-----------\
|
|
|
|
|
| Begin cCCC| | Begin cCCC|
|
|
|
|
|
| Object 0 | | Object 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 1 | | unit 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 2 | | unit 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 3 | | unit 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe |
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 4 | | unit 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
|
|
|
| End cCCC | | End cCCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Object 0 | | Object 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
\-----------/ \-----------/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If you anticipate large images sizes, large S3 or Swift objects (e.g., video),
|
|
|
|
|
or large CephFS directories, you may see considerable read/write performance
|
|
|
|
|
improvements by striping client data over multiple objects within an object set.
|
2012-12-04 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Significant write performance occurs when the client writes the stripe units to
|
|
|
|
|
their corresponding objects in parallel. Since objects get mapped to different
|
|
|
|
|
placement groups and further mapped to different OSDs, each write occurs in
|
|
|
|
|
parallel at the maximum write speed. A write to a single disk would be limited
|
|
|
|
|
by the head movement (e.g. 6ms per seek) and bandwidth of that one device (e.g.
|
|
|
|
|
100MB/s). By spreading that write over multiple objects (which map to different
|
|
|
|
|
placement groups and OSDs) Ceph can reduce the number of seeks per drive and
|
|
|
|
|
combine the throughput of multiple drives to achieve much faster write (or read)
|
|
|
|
|
speeds.
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. note:: Striping is independent of object replicas. Since CRUSH
|
|
|
|
|
replicates objects across OSDs, stripes get replicated automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
In the following diagram, client data gets striped across an object set
|
|
|
|
|
(``object set 1`` in the following diagram) consisting of 4 objects, where the
|
2012-12-04 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
first stripe unit is ``stripe unit 0`` in ``object 0``, and the fourth stripe
|
|
|
|
|
unit is ``stripe unit 3`` in ``object 3``. After writing the fourth stripe, the
|
|
|
|
|
client determines if the object set is full. If the object set is not full, the
|
|
|
|
|
client begins writing a stripe to the first object again (``object 0`` in the
|
|
|
|
|
following diagram). If the object set is full, the client creates a new object
|
|
|
|
|
set (``object set 2`` in the following diagram), and begins writing to the first
|
|
|
|
|
stripe (``stripe unit 16``) in the first object in the new object set (``object
|
|
|
|
|
4`` in the diagram below).
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa::
|
2012-12-04 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Client Data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Format |
|
|
|
|
|
| cCCC |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------------+--------+--------+-----------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | +--\
|
|
|
|
|
v v v v |
|
|
|
|
|
/-----------\ /-----------\ /-----------\ /-----------\ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Begin cCCC| | Begin cCCC| | Begin cCCC| | Begin cCCC| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Object 0 | | Object 1 | | Object 2 | | Object 3 | |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ |
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe | | stripe | | stripe | |
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 0 | | unit 1 | | unit 2 | | unit 3 | |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ |
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe | | stripe | | stripe | +-\
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 4 | | unit 5 | | unit 6 | | unit 7 | | Object
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +- Set
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe | | stripe | | stripe | | 1
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 8 | | unit 9 | | unit 10 | | unit 11 | +-/
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ |
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe | | stripe | | stripe | |
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 12 | | unit 13 | | unit 14 | | unit 15 | |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ |
|
|
|
|
|
| End cCCC | | End cCCC | | End cCCC | | End cCCC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Object 0 | | Object 1 | | Object 2 | | Object 3 | |
|
|
|
|
|
\-----------/ \-----------/ \-----------/ \-----------/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--/
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-04 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
+--\
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/-----------\ /-----------\ /-----------\ /-----------\ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Begin cCCC| | Begin cCCC| | Begin cCCC| | Begin cCCC| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Object 4 | | Object 5 | | Object 6 | | Object 7 | |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ |
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe | | stripe | | stripe | |
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 16 | | unit 17 | | unit 18 | | unit 19 | |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ |
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe | | stripe | | stripe | +-\
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 20 | | unit 21 | | unit 22 | | unit 23 | | Object
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +- Set
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe | | stripe | | stripe | | 2
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 24 | | unit 25 | | unit 26 | | unit 27 | +-/
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ |
|
|
|
|
|
| stripe | | stripe | | stripe | | stripe | |
|
|
|
|
|
| unit 28 | | unit 29 | | unit 30 | | unit 31 | |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ +-----------+ |
|
|
|
|
|
| End cCCC | | End cCCC | | End cCCC | | End cCCC | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Object 4 | | Object 5 | | Object 6 | | Object 7 | |
|
|
|
|
|
\-----------/ \-----------/ \-----------/ \-----------/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--/
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three important variables determine how Ceph stripes data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
- **Object Size:** Objects in the Ceph Storage Cluster have a maximum
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
configurable size (e.g., 2MB, 4MB, etc.). The object size should be large
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
enough to accommodate many stripe units, and should be a multiple of
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the stripe unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-04 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
- **Stripe Width:** Stripes have a configurable unit size (e.g., 64kb).
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The Ceph Client divides the data it will write to objects into equally
|
2012-12-04 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
sized stripe units, except for the last stripe unit. A stripe width,
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
should be a fraction of the Object Size so that an object may contain
|
|
|
|
|
many stripe units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
- **Stripe Count:** The Ceph Client writes a sequence of stripe units
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
over a series of objects determined by the stripe count. The series
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
of objects is called an object set. After the Ceph Client writes to
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the last object in the object set, it returns to the first object in
|
|
|
|
|
the object set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. important:: Test the performance of your striping configuration before
|
|
|
|
|
putting your cluster into production. You CANNOT change these striping
|
|
|
|
|
parameters after you stripe the data and write it to objects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Once the Ceph Client has striped data to stripe units and mapped the stripe
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
units to objects, Ceph's CRUSH algorithm maps the objects to placement groups,
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
and the placement groups to Ceph OSD Daemons before the objects are stored as
|
|
|
|
|
files on a storage disk.
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. note:: Since a client writes to a single pool, all data striped into objects
|
|
|
|
|
get mapped to placement groups in the same pool. So they use the same CRUSH
|
|
|
|
|
map and the same access controls.
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; Ceph Clients
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph Clients
|
|
|
|
|
============
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph Clients include a number of service interfaces. These include:
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
- **Block Devices:** The :term:`Ceph Block Device` (a.k.a., RBD) service
|
|
|
|
|
provides resizable, thin-provisioned block devices with snapshotting and
|
|
|
|
|
cloning. Ceph stripes a block device across the cluster for high
|
|
|
|
|
performance. Ceph supports both kernel objects (KO) and a QEMU hypervisor
|
|
|
|
|
that uses ``librbd`` directly--avoiding the kernel object overhead for
|
|
|
|
|
virtualized systems.
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
- **Object Storage:** The :term:`Ceph Object Storage` (a.k.a., RGW) service
|
|
|
|
|
provides RESTful APIs with interfaces that are compatible with Amazon S3
|
|
|
|
|
and OpenStack Swift.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Filesystem**: The :term:`Ceph Filesystem` (CephFS) service provides
|
|
|
|
|
a POSIX compliant filesystem usable with ``mount`` or as
|
|
|
|
|
a filesytem in user space (FUSE).
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph can run additional instances of OSDs, MDSs, and monitors for scalability
|
|
|
|
|
and high availability. The following diagram depicts the high-level
|
|
|
|
|
architecture.
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa::
|
|
|
|
|
+--------------+ +----------------+ +-------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Block Device | | Object Storage | | Ceph FS |
|
|
|
|
|
+--------------+ +----------------+ +-------------+
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
+--------------+ +----------------+ +-------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| librbd | | librgw | | libcephfs |
|
|
|
|
|
+--------------+ +----------------+ +-------------+
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
+---------------------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Ceph Storage Cluster Protocol (librados) |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------------------------------------------+
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
+---------------+ +---------------+ +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| OSDs | | MDSs | | Monitors |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+ +---------------+ +---------------+
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-14 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: architecture; Ceph Object Storage
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph Object Storage
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The Ceph Object Storage daemon, ``radosgw``, is a FastCGI service that provides
|
|
|
|
|
a RESTful_ HTTP API to store objects and metadata. It layers on top of the Ceph
|
|
|
|
|
Storage Cluster with its own data formats, and maintains its own user database,
|
|
|
|
|
authentication, and access control. The RADOS Gateway uses a unified namespace,
|
|
|
|
|
which means you can use either the OpenStack Swift-compatible API or the Amazon
|
|
|
|
|
S3-compatible API. For example, you can write data using the S3-comptable API
|
|
|
|
|
with one application and then read data using the Swift-compatible API with
|
|
|
|
|
another application.
|
2012-09-18 18:08:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. topic:: S3/Swift Objects and Store Cluster Objects Compared
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph's Object Storage uses the term *object* to describe the data it stores.
|
|
|
|
|
S3 and Swift objects are not the same as the objects that Ceph writes to the
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Storage Cluster. Ceph Object Storage objects are mapped to Ceph Storage
|
|
|
|
|
Cluster objects. The S3 and Swift objects do not necessarily
|
|
|
|
|
correspond in a 1:1 manner with an object stored in the storage cluster. It
|
|
|
|
|
is possible for an S3 or Swift object to map to multiple Ceph objects.
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
See `Ceph Object Storage`_ for details.
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-16 20:57:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: Ceph Block Device; block device; RBD; Rados Block Device
|
2012-11-05 19:02:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph Block Device
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
2012-11-05 19:02:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
A Ceph Block Device stripes a block device image over multiple objects in the
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph Storage Cluster, where each object gets mapped to a placement group and
|
|
|
|
|
distributed, and the placement groups are spread across separate ``ceph-osd``
|
|
|
|
|
daemons throughout the cluster.
|
2012-11-05 19:02:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. important:: Striping allows RBD block devices to perform better than a single
|
|
|
|
|
server could!
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Thin-provisioned snapshottable Ceph Block Devices are an attractive option for
|
|
|
|
|
virtualization and cloud computing. In virtual machine scenarios, people
|
|
|
|
|
typically deploy a Ceph Block Device with the ``rbd`` network storage driver in
|
|
|
|
|
Qemu/KVM, where the host machine uses ``librbd`` to provide a block device
|
|
|
|
|
service to the guest. Many cloud computing stacks use ``libvirt`` to integrate
|
|
|
|
|
with hypervisors. You can use thin-provisioned Ceph Block Devices with Qemu and
|
|
|
|
|
``libvirt`` to support OpenStack and CloudStack among other solutions.
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
While we do not provide ``librbd`` support with other hypervisors at this time,
|
|
|
|
|
you may also use Ceph Block Device kernel objects to provide a block device to a
|
|
|
|
|
client. Other virtualization technologies such as Xen can access the Ceph Block
|
|
|
|
|
Device kernel object(s). This is done with the command-line tool ``rbd``.
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-16 20:57:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. index:: Ceph FS; Ceph Filesystem; libcephfs; MDS; metadata server; ceph-mds
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph Filesystem
|
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The Ceph Filesystem (Ceph FS) provides a POSIX-compliant filesystem as a
|
|
|
|
|
service that is layered on top of the object-based Ceph Storage Cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph FS files get mapped to objects that Ceph stores in the Ceph Storage
|
|
|
|
|
Cluster. Ceph Clients mount a CephFS filesystem as a kernel object or as
|
|
|
|
|
a Filesystem in User Space (FUSE).
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. ditaa::
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------------------+ +------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| CephFS Kernel Object | | CephFS FUSE |
|
|
|
|
|
+-----------------------+ +------------------------+
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
+---------------------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Ceph FS Library (libcephfs) |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------------------------------------------+
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
+---------------------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| Ceph Storage Cluster Protocol (librados) |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------------------------------------------+
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
+---------------+ +---------------+ +---------------+
|
|
|
|
|
| OSDs | | MDSs | | Monitors |
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+ +---------------+ +---------------+
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The Ceph Filesystem service includes the Ceph Metadata Server (MDS) deployed
|
|
|
|
|
with the Ceph Storage cluster. The purpose of the MDS is to to store all the
|
|
|
|
|
filesystem metadata (directories, file ownership, access modes, etc) in
|
|
|
|
|
high-availability Ceph Metadata Servers where the metadata resides in memory.
|
|
|
|
|
The reason for the MDS (a daemon called ``ceph-mds``) is that simple filesystem
|
|
|
|
|
operations like listing a directory or changing a directory (``ls``, ``cd``)
|
|
|
|
|
would tax the Ceph OSD Daemons unnecessarily. So separating the metadata from
|
|
|
|
|
the data means that the Ceph Filesystem can provide high performance services
|
|
|
|
|
without taxing the Ceph Storage Cluster.
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ceph FS separates the metadata from the data, storing the metadata in the MDS,
|
|
|
|
|
and storing the file data in one or more objects in the Ceph Storage Cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
The Ceph filesystem aims for POSIX compatibility. ``ceph-mds`` can run as a
|
|
|
|
|
single process, or it can be distributed out to multiple physical machines,
|
|
|
|
|
either for high availability or for scalability.
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
- **High Availability**: The extra ``ceph-mds`` instances can be `standby`,
|
|
|
|
|
ready to take over the duties of any failed ``ceph-mds`` that was
|
|
|
|
|
`active`. This is easy because all the data, including the journal, is
|
|
|
|
|
stored on RADOS. The transition is triggered automatically by ``ceph-mon``.
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
- **Scalability**: Multiple ``ceph-mds`` instances can be `active`, and they
|
|
|
|
|
will split the directory tree into subtrees (and shards of a single
|
|
|
|
|
busy directory), effectively balancing the load amongst all `active`
|
|
|
|
|
servers.
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Combinations of `standby` and `active` etc are possible, for example
|
|
|
|
|
running 3 `active` ``ceph-mds`` instances for scaling, and one `standby`
|
|
|
|
|
instance for high availability.
|
2011-12-01 23:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-12-04 04:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-15 00:05:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
.. _RADOS - A Scalable, Reliable Storage Service for Petabyte-scale Storage Clusters: http://ceph.com/papers/weil-rados-pdsw07.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Paxos: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paxos_(computer_science)
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Monitor Config Reference: ../rados/configuration/mon-config-ref
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Monitoring OSDs and PGs: ../rados/operations/monitoring-osd-pg
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Heartbeats: ../rados/configuration/mon-osd-interaction
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Monitoring OSDs: ../rados/operations/monitoring-osd-pg/#monitoring-osds
|
|
|
|
|
.. _CRUSH - Controlled, Scalable, Decentralized Placement of Replicated Data: http://ceph.com/papers/weil-crush-sc06.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Data Scrubbing: ../rados/configuration/osd-config-ref#scrubbing
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Report Peering Failure: ../rados/configuration/mon-osd-interaction#osds-report-peering-failure
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Troubleshooting Peering Failure: ../rados/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-pg#placement-group-down-peering-failure
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Ceph Authentication and Authorization: ../rados/operations/auth-intro/
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Hardware Recommendations: ../install/hardware-recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Network Config Reference: ../rados/configuration/network-config-ref
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Data Scrubbing: ../rados/configuration/osd-config-ref#scrubbing
|
|
|
|
|
.. _striping: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_striping
|
|
|
|
|
.. _RAID: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID
|
|
|
|
|
.. _RAID 0: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID_0#RAID_0
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Ceph Object Storage: ../radosgw/
|
|
|
|
|
.. _RESTful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RESTful
|