2012-05-22 01:21:39 +00:00
|
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
Frequently Asked Questions
|
|
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
These questions have been frequently asked on the ceph-users and ceph-devel
|
|
|
|
mailing lists, the IRC channel, and on the `Ceph.com`_ blog.
|
2012-09-11 18:09:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Ceph.com: http://ceph.com
|
2012-05-22 01:21:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-22 01:21:39 +00:00
|
|
|
Is Ceph Production-Quality?
|
|
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-22 22:41:09 +00:00
|
|
|
Ceph's object store (RADOS) is production ready. Large-scale storage systems (i.e.,
|
|
|
|
petabytes of data) use Ceph's RESTful Object Gateway (RGW), which provides APIs
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
compatible with Amazon's S3 and OpenStack's Swift. Many deployments also use
|
2013-02-22 22:41:09 +00:00
|
|
|
the Ceph Block Device (RBD), including deployments of OpenStack and CloudStack.
|
|
|
|
`Inktank`_ provides commercial support for the Ceph object store, Object
|
|
|
|
Gateway, block devices and CephFS with running a single metadata server.
|
2012-05-22 01:21:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
The CephFS POSIX-compliant filesystem is functionally complete and has been
|
|
|
|
evaluated by a large community of users. There are production systems using
|
|
|
|
CephFS with a single metadata server. The Ceph community is actively testing
|
2013-02-13 20:44:35 +00:00
|
|
|
clusters with multiple metadata servers for quality assurance. Once CephFS
|
|
|
|
passes QA muster when running with multiple metadata servers, `Inktank`_ will
|
|
|
|
provide commercial support for CephFS with multiple metadata servers, too.
|
2012-05-22 01:21:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-09-11 18:09:01 +00:00
|
|
|
.. _Inktank: http://inktank.com
|
2012-05-22 01:21:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What Kind of Hardware Does Ceph Require?
|
|
|
|
========================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph runs on commodity hardware. A typical configuration involves a
|
|
|
|
rack mountable server with a baseboard management controller, multiple
|
|
|
|
processors, multiple drives, and multiple NICs. There are no requirements for
|
|
|
|
proprietary hardware. For details, see `Ceph Hardware Recommendations`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What Kind of OS Does Ceph Require?
|
|
|
|
==================================
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-22 22:41:09 +00:00
|
|
|
Ceph runs on Linux for both the client and server side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph runs on Debian/Ubuntu distributions, which you can install from `APT
|
|
|
|
packages`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph also runs on Fedora and Enterprise Linux derivates (RHEL, CentOS) using
|
|
|
|
`RPM packages`_ .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can also download Ceph source `tarballs`_ and build Ceph for your
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
distribution. See `Installation`_ for details.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-25 16:19:58 +00:00
|
|
|
.. _try-ceph:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How Can I Give Ceph a Try?
|
|
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follow our `Quick Start`_ guides. They will get you up an running quickly
|
|
|
|
without requiring deeper knowledge of Ceph. Our `Quick Start`_ guides will also
|
|
|
|
help you avoid a few issues related to limited deployments. If you choose to
|
|
|
|
stray from the Quick Starts, there are a few things you need to know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recommend using at least two hosts, and a recent Linux kernel. In older
|
|
|
|
kernels, Ceph can deadlock if you try to mount CephFS or RBD client services on
|
|
|
|
the same host that runs your test Ceph cluster. This is not a Ceph-related
|
|
|
|
issue. It's related to memory pressure and needing to relieve free memory.
|
|
|
|
Recent kernels with up-to-date ``glibc`` and ``syncfs(2)`` reduce this issue
|
|
|
|
considerably. However, a memory pool large enough to handle incoming requests is
|
|
|
|
the only thing that guarantees against the deadlock occuring. When you run Ceph
|
|
|
|
clients on a Ceph cluster machine, loopback NFS can experience a similar problem
|
|
|
|
related to buffer cache management in the kernel. You can avoid these scenarios
|
|
|
|
entirely by using a separate client host, which is more realistic for deployment
|
|
|
|
scenarios anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recommend using at least two OSDs with at least two replicas of the data.
|
|
|
|
OSDs report other OSDs to the monitor, and also interact with other OSDs when
|
|
|
|
replicating data. If you have only one OSD, a second OSD cannot check its
|
|
|
|
heartbeat. Also, if an OSD expects another OSD to tell it which placement groups
|
|
|
|
it should have, the lack of another OSD prevents this from occurring. So a
|
|
|
|
placement group can remain stuck "stale" forever. These are not likely
|
|
|
|
production issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, `Quick Start`_ guides are a way to get you up and running quickly. To
|
|
|
|
build performant systems, you'll need a drive for each OSD, and you will likely
|
|
|
|
benefit by writing the OSD journal to a separate drive from the OSD data.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How Many OSDs Can I Run per Host?
|
|
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretically, a host can run as many OSDs as the hardware can support. Many
|
|
|
|
vendors market storage hosts that have large numbers of drives (e.g., 36 drives)
|
|
|
|
capable of supporting many OSDs. We don't recommend a huge number of OSDs per
|
|
|
|
host though. Ceph was designed to distribute the load across what we call
|
|
|
|
"failure domains." See `CRUSH Maps`_ for details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the petabyte scale, hardware failure is an expectation, not a freak
|
|
|
|
occurrence. Failure domains include datacenters, rooms, rows, racks, and network
|
|
|
|
switches. In a single host, power supplies, motherboards, NICs, and drives are
|
|
|
|
all potential points of failure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you place a large percentage of your OSDs on a single host and that host
|
|
|
|
fails, a large percentage of your OSDs will fail too. Having too large a
|
|
|
|
percentage of a cluster's OSDs on a single host can cause disruptive data
|
|
|
|
migration and long recovery times during host failures. We encourage
|
|
|
|
diversifying the risk across failure domains, and that includes making
|
|
|
|
reasonable tradeoffs regarding the number of OSDs per host.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I Use the Same Drive for Multiple OSDs?
|
|
|
|
===========================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. **Please don't do this!** Except for initial evaluations of Ceph, we do not
|
|
|
|
recommend running multiple OSDs on the same drive. In fact, we recommend
|
|
|
|
**exactly** the opposite. Only run one OSD per drive. For better performance,
|
|
|
|
run journals on a separate drive from the OSD drive, and consider using SSDs for
|
|
|
|
journals. Run operating systems on a separate drive from any drive storing data
|
|
|
|
for Ceph.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage drives are a performance bottleneck. Total throughput is an important
|
|
|
|
consideration. Sequential reads and writes are important considerations too.
|
|
|
|
When you run multiple OSDs per drive, you split up the total throughput between
|
|
|
|
competing OSDs, which can slow performance considerably.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why Do You Recommend One Drive Per OSD?
|
|
|
|
=======================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph OSD performance is one of the most common requests for assistance, and
|
|
|
|
running an OS, a journal and an OSD on the same disk is a frequently the
|
|
|
|
impediment to high performance. Total throughput and simultaneous reads and
|
|
|
|
writes are a major bottleneck. If you journal data, run an OS, or run multiple
|
|
|
|
OSDs on the same drive, you will very likely see performance degrade
|
|
|
|
significantly--especially under high loads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running multiple OSDs on a single drive is fine for evaluation purposes. We
|
|
|
|
even encourage that in our `5-minute quick start`_. However, just because it
|
|
|
|
works does NOT mean that it will provide acceptable performance in an
|
|
|
|
operational cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 20:39:24 +00:00
|
|
|
What Underlying Filesystem Do You Recommend?
|
|
|
|
============================================
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 20:39:24 +00:00
|
|
|
Currently, we recommend using XFS as the underlying filesystem for OSD drives.
|
|
|
|
We think ``btrfs`` will become the optimal filesystem. However, we still
|
|
|
|
encounter enough issues that we do not recommend it for production systems yet.
|
|
|
|
See `Filesystem Recommendations`_ for details.
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How Does Ceph Ensure Data Integrity Across Replicas?
|
|
|
|
====================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph periodically scrubs placement groups to ensure that they contain the same
|
|
|
|
information. Low-level or deep scrubbing reads the object data in each replica
|
|
|
|
of the placement group to ensure that the data is identical across replicas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How Many NICs Per Host?
|
|
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can use one :abbr:`NIC (Network Interface Card)` per machine. We recommend a
|
|
|
|
minimum of two NICs: one for a public (front-side) network and one for a cluster
|
|
|
|
(back-side) network. When you write an object from the client to the primary
|
|
|
|
OSD, that single write only accounts for the bandwidth consumed during one leg
|
|
|
|
of the transaction. If you store multiple copies (usually 2-3 copies in a
|
|
|
|
typical cluster), the primary OSD makes a write request to your secondary and
|
|
|
|
tertiary OSDs. So your back-end network traffic can dwarf your front-end network
|
|
|
|
traffic on writes very easily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What Kind of Network Throughput Do I Need?
|
|
|
|
==========================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network throughput requirements depend on your load. We recommend starting with
|
|
|
|
a minimum of 1GB Ethernet. 10GB Ethernet is more expensive, but often comes with
|
|
|
|
some additional advantages, including virtual LANs (VLANs). VLANs can
|
|
|
|
dramatically reduce the cabling requirements when you run front-side, back-side
|
|
|
|
and other special purpose networks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of object copies (replicas) you create is an important factor,
|
|
|
|
because replication becomes a larger network load than the initial write itself
|
|
|
|
when making multiple copies (e.g., triplicate). Network traffic between Ceph and
|
|
|
|
a cloud-based system such as OpenStack or CloudStack may also become a factor.
|
|
|
|
Some deployments even run a separate NIC for management APIs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally load spikes are a factor too. Certain times of the day, week or month
|
|
|
|
you may see load spikes. You must plan your network capacity to meet those load
|
|
|
|
spikes in order for Ceph to perform well. This means that excess capacity may
|
|
|
|
remain idle or unused during low load times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can Ceph Support Multiple Data Centers?
|
|
|
|
=======================================
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 20:39:24 +00:00
|
|
|
Yes, but with safeguards to ensure data safety. When a client writes data to
|
|
|
|
Ceph the primary OSD will not acknowledge the write to the client until the
|
|
|
|
secondary OSDs have written the replicas synchronously. See `How Ceph Scales`_
|
|
|
|
for details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ceph community is working to ensure that OSD/monitor heartbeats and peering
|
|
|
|
processes operate effectively with the additional latency that may occur when
|
|
|
|
deploying hardware in different geographic locations. See `Monitor/OSD
|
|
|
|
Interaction`_ for details.
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your data centers have dedicated bandwidth and low latency, you can
|
2013-02-13 20:39:24 +00:00
|
|
|
distribute your cluster across data centers easily. If you use a WAN over the
|
|
|
|
Internet, you may need to configure Ceph to ensure effective peering, heartbeat
|
|
|
|
acknowledgement and writes to ensure the cluster performs well with additional
|
|
|
|
WAN latency.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-22 22:41:09 +00:00
|
|
|
The Ceph community is working on an asynchronous write capability via the Ceph
|
|
|
|
Object Gateway (RGW) which will provide an eventually-consistent copy of data
|
|
|
|
for disaster recovery purposes. This will work with data read and written via
|
|
|
|
the Object Gateway only. Work is also starting on a similar capability for Ceph
|
|
|
|
Block devices which are managed via the various cloudstacks.
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How Does Ceph Authenticate Users?
|
|
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph provides an authentication framework called ``cephx`` that operates in a
|
|
|
|
manner similar to Kerberos. The principal difference is that Ceph's
|
|
|
|
authentication system is distributed too, so that it doesn't constitute a single
|
|
|
|
point of failure. For details, see `Ceph Authentication & Authorization`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does Ceph Authentication Provide Multi-tenancy?
|
|
|
|
===============================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph provides authentication at the `pool`_ level, which may be sufficient
|
|
|
|
for multi-tenancy in limited cases. Ceph plans on developing authentication
|
|
|
|
namespaces within pools in future releases, so that Ceph is well-suited for
|
|
|
|
multi-tenancy within pools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can Ceph use other Multi-tenancy Modules?
|
|
|
|
=========================================
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-22 22:41:09 +00:00
|
|
|
The Bobtail release of Ceph integrates the Object Gateway with OpenStack's Keystone.
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
See `Keystone Integration`_ for details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Keystone Integration: ../radosgw/config#integrating-with-openstack-keystone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does Ceph Enforce Quotas?
|
|
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, Ceph doesn't provide enforced storage quotas. The Ceph community has
|
|
|
|
discussed enforcing user quotas within CephFS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does Ceph Track Per User Usage?
|
|
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CephFS filesystem provides user-based usage tracking on a subtree basis.
|
|
|
|
RADOS Gateway also provides detailed per-user usage tracking. RBD and the
|
|
|
|
underlying object store do not track per user statistics. The underlying object
|
|
|
|
store provides storage capacity utilization statistics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does Ceph Provide Billing?
|
|
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-22 22:41:09 +00:00
|
|
|
Usage information is available via a RESTful API for the Ceph Object Gateway
|
|
|
|
which can be integrated into billing systems. Usage data at the RADOS pool
|
|
|
|
level is not currently possible but is on the roadmap.
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can Ceph Export a Filesystem via NFS or Samba/CIFS?
|
|
|
|
===================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph doesn't export CephFS via NFS or Samba. However, you can use a gateway to
|
|
|
|
serve a CephFS filesystem to NFS or Samba clients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I Access Ceph via a Hypervisor?
|
|
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, the `QEMU`_ hypervisor can interact with the Ceph `block device`_.
|
|
|
|
The :abbr:`KVM (Kernel Virtual Machine)` `module`_ and the `librbd` library
|
|
|
|
allow you to use QEMU with Ceph. Most Ceph deployments use the `librbd` library.
|
|
|
|
Cloud solutions like `OpenStack`_ and `CloudStack`_ interact `libvirt`_ and QEMU
|
|
|
|
to as a means of integrating with Ceph.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-22 22:41:09 +00:00
|
|
|
Ceph integrates cloud solutions via ``libvirt`` and QEMU. The Ceph community
|
2013-02-23 00:43:44 +00:00
|
|
|
is also looking to support the Xen hypervisor in a future release.
|
2013-02-22 22:41:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is interest in support for VMWare, but there is no deep-level integration
|
|
|
|
between VMWare and Ceph as yet.
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can Block, CephFS, and Gateway Clients Share Data?
|
|
|
|
==================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the most part, no. You cannot write data to Ceph using RBD and access the
|
|
|
|
same data via CephFS, for example. You cannot write data with RADOS gateway and
|
|
|
|
read it with RBD. However, you can write data with the RADOS Gateway
|
|
|
|
S3-compatible API and read the same data using the RADOS Gateway
|
|
|
|
Swift-comptatible API.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RBD, CephFS and the RADOS Gateway each have their own namespace. The way they
|
|
|
|
store data differs significantly enough that it isn't possible to use the
|
|
|
|
clients interchangeably. However, you can use all three types of clients, and
|
|
|
|
clients you develop yourself via ``librados`` simultaneously on the same
|
|
|
|
cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which Ceph Clients Support Striping?
|
|
|
|
====================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph clients--RBD, CephFS and RADOS Gateway--providing striping capability. For
|
|
|
|
details on striping, see `Striping`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What Programming Languages can Interact with the Object Store?
|
|
|
|
==============================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph's ``librados`` is written in the C programming language. There are
|
|
|
|
interfaces for other languages, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- C++
|
|
|
|
- Java
|
|
|
|
- PHP
|
|
|
|
- Python
|
|
|
|
- Ruby
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I Develop a Client With Another Language?
|
|
|
|
=============================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceph does not have many native bindings for ``librados`` at this time. If you'd
|
|
|
|
like to fork Ceph and build a wrapper to the C or C++ versions of ``librados``,
|
|
|
|
please check out the `Ceph repository`_. You can also use other languages that
|
|
|
|
can use the ``librados`` native bindings (e.g., you can access the C/C++ bindings
|
|
|
|
from within Perl).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do Ceph Clients Run on Windows?
|
|
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. There are no immediate plans to support Windows clients at this time. However,
|
|
|
|
you may be able to emulate a Linux environment on a Windows host. For example,
|
|
|
|
Cygwin may make it feasible to use ``librados`` in an emulated environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-22 01:21:39 +00:00
|
|
|
How can I add a question to this list?
|
|
|
|
======================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you'd like to add a question to this list (hopefully with an
|
|
|
|
accompanying answer!), you can find it in the doc/ directory of our
|
|
|
|
main git repository:
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-22 02:36:59 +00:00
|
|
|
`https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/doc/faq.rst`_
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-22 01:21:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use Sphinx to manage our documentation, and this page is generated
|
|
|
|
from reStructuredText source. See the section on Building Ceph
|
|
|
|
Documentation for the build procedure.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-13 20:06:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Ceph Hardware Recommendations: ../install/hardware-recommendations
|
|
|
|
.. _APT packages: ../install/debian
|
|
|
|
.. _RPM packages: ../install/rpm
|
|
|
|
.. _tarballs: ../install/get-tarballs
|
|
|
|
.. _Installation: ../install
|
|
|
|
.. _CRUSH Maps: ../rados/operations/crush-map
|
|
|
|
.. _5-minute quick start: ../start/quick-start
|
|
|
|
.. _How Ceph Scales: ../architecture#how-ceph-scales
|
|
|
|
.. _Monitor/OSD Interaction: ../rados/configuration/mon-osd-interaction
|
|
|
|
.. _Ceph Authentication & Authorization: ../rados/operations/auth-intro
|
|
|
|
.. _Ceph repository: https://github.com/ceph/ceph
|
|
|
|
.. _QEMU: ../rbd/qemu-rbd
|
|
|
|
.. _block device: ../rbd
|
|
|
|
.. _module: ../rbd/rbd-ko
|
|
|
|
.. _libvirt: ../rbd/libvirt
|
|
|
|
.. _OpenStack: ../rbd/rbd-openstack
|
|
|
|
.. _CloudStack: ../rbd/rbd-cloudstack
|
|
|
|
.. _pool: ../rados/operations/pools
|
|
|
|
.. _Striping: ../architecture##how-ceph-clients-stripe-data
|
|
|
|
.. _https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/doc/faq.rst: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/doc/faq.rst
|
|
|
|
.. _Filesystem Recommendations: ../rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations
|
2013-02-25 16:19:58 +00:00
|
|
|
.. _Quick Start: ../start
|