mirror of
https://github.com/ceph/ceph
synced 2024-12-26 05:25:09 +00:00
78 lines
3.1 KiB
ReStructuredText
78 lines
3.1 KiB
ReStructuredText
|
====================================
|
||
|
|
Filestore filesystem compatilibity
|
||
|
|
====================================
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&m=131942130322957&w=2
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Although running on ext4, xfs, or whatever other non-btrfs you want mostly
|
||
|
|
works, there are a few important remaining issues:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
ext4 limits total xattrs for 4KB
|
||
|
|
================================
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This can cause problems in some cases, as Ceph uses xattrs
|
||
|
|
extensively. Most of the time we don't hit this. We do hit the limit
|
||
|
|
with radosgw pretty easily, though, and may also hit it in exceptional
|
||
|
|
cases where the OSD cluster is very unhealthy.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
There is a large xattr patch for ext4 from the Lustre folks that has been
|
||
|
|
floating around for (I think) years. Maybe as interest grows in running
|
||
|
|
Ceph on ext4 this can move upstream.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Previously we were being forgiving about large setxattr failures on ext3,
|
||
|
|
but we found that was leading to corruption in certain cases (because we
|
||
|
|
couldn't set our internal metadata), so the next release will assert/crash
|
||
|
|
in that case (fail-stop instead of fail-maybe-eventually-corrupt).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
XFS does not have an xattr size limit and thus does have this problem.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
OSD journal replay of non-idempotent transactions
|
||
|
|
=================================================
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**Resolved** with full sync but not ideal.
|
||
|
|
See http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/213
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
On non-btrfs backends, the Ceph OSDs use a write-ahead journal. After
|
||
|
|
restart, the OSD does not know exactly which transactions in the
|
||
|
|
journal may have already been committed to disk, and may reapply a
|
||
|
|
transaction again during replay. For most operations (write, delete,
|
||
|
|
truncate) this is fine.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Some operations, though, are non-idempotent. The simplest example is
|
||
|
|
CLONE, which copies (efficiently, on btrfs) data from one object to
|
||
|
|
another. If the source object is modified, the osd restarts, and then
|
||
|
|
the clone is replayed, the target will get incorrect (newer) data. For
|
||
|
|
example,
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- clone A -> B
|
||
|
|
- modify A
|
||
|
|
- <osd crash, replay from 1>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
B will get new instead of old contents.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
(This doesn't happen on btrfs because the snapshots allow us to replay
|
||
|
|
from a known consistent point in time.)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Possibilities:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- full sync after any non-idempotent operation
|
||
|
|
- re-evaluate the lower level interface based on needs from higher
|
||
|
|
levels, construct only safe operations, be very careful; brittle
|
||
|
|
- use xattrs to add sequence numbers to objects:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- on non-btrfs, we set a xattr on every modified object with the
|
||
|
|
op_seq, the unique sequence number for the transaction.
|
||
|
|
- for any (potentially) non-idempotent operation, we fsync() before
|
||
|
|
continuing to the next transaction, to ensure that xattr hits disk.
|
||
|
|
- on replay, we skip a transaction if the xattr indicates we already
|
||
|
|
performed this transaction.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Because every 'transaction' only modifies on a single object (file),
|
||
|
|
this ought to work. It'll make things like clone slow, but let's
|
||
|
|
face it: they're already slow on non-btrfs file systems because they
|
||
|
|
actually copy the data (instead of duplicating the extent refs in
|
||
|
|
btrfs). And it should make the full ObjectStore iterface safe,
|
||
|
|
without upper layers having to worry about the kinds and orders of
|
||
|
|
transactions they perform.
|