ceph/qa/suites/rados/thrash-erasure-code-big/thrashers/mapgap.yaml

overrides:
  ceph:
    log-ignorelist:
    - but it is still running
    - objects unfound and apparently lost
    - osd_map_cache_size
    conf:
      mon:
        mon min osdmap epochs: 2
      osd:
        osd map cache size: 1
        osd scrub min interval: 60
        osd scrub max interval: 120
tasks:
- thrashosds:
    timeout: 1800
    chance_pgnum_grow: 1
    chance_pgnum_shrink: 1
    chance_pgpnum_fix: 1
    chance_test_map_discontinuity: 0.5
    min_in: 8
erasure-code: lrc plugin workload Add a workload that uses the lrc erasure code plugin. Instead of adding it to suites/rados/thrash-erasure-code/workloads, a new suite is created at suites/rados/thrash-erasure-code-big because it needs more OSDs than other erasure code plugins. The alternative would be to increase the number of OSDs for all erasure code plugins, but that would needlessly increase the resources requirements. * cluster/12-osds.yaml creates a 12 OSDs, 3 MONs cluster * thrash-erasure-code-big/thrashers/.yaml are the same as thrash-erasure-code/thrashers/.yaml except they require that at least 8 OSDs are in at all times (instead of 4) because lrc PGs with k=4, m=2, l=3 are undersized if they do not have 8 OSDs. It is possible that crush fails to map 8 OSDs when only 8 OSDs are available, but that must not disturb the workload because min_size is 4. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11666 Fixes: #11666 Signed-off-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com> 2015-05-26 08:38:50 +00:00			`overrides:`
			`ceph:`
qa: log-whitelist -> log-ignorelist Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> 2020-06-17 19:33:57 +00:00			`log-ignorelist:`
qa: update whitelist for "wrongly marked me down" Signed-off-by: John Spray <john.spray@redhat.com> 2017-07-17 12:29:27 +00:00			`- but it is still running`
qa/suites/rados/threas-erasure-code-*: fix luminous facet Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com> 2017-05-15 14:22:25 +00:00			`- objects unfound and apparently lost`
			`- osd_map_cache_size`
erasure-code: lrc plugin workload Add a workload that uses the lrc erasure code plugin. Instead of adding it to suites/rados/thrash-erasure-code/workloads, a new suite is created at suites/rados/thrash-erasure-code-big because it needs more OSDs than other erasure code plugins. The alternative would be to increase the number of OSDs for all erasure code plugins, but that would needlessly increase the resources requirements. * cluster/12-osds.yaml creates a 12 OSDs, 3 MONs cluster * thrash-erasure-code-big/thrashers/.yaml are the same as thrash-erasure-code/thrashers/.yaml except they require that at least 8 OSDs are in at all times (instead of 4) because lrc PGs with k=4, m=2, l=3 are undersized if they do not have 8 OSDs. It is possible that crush fails to map 8 OSDs when only 8 OSDs are available, but that must not disturb the workload because min_size is 4. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11666 Fixes: #11666 Signed-off-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com> 2015-05-26 08:38:50 +00:00			`conf:`
			`mon:`
			`mon min osdmap epochs: 2`
			`osd:`
			`osd map cache size: 1`
			`osd scrub min interval: 60`
			`osd scrub max interval: 120`
			`tasks:`
			`- thrashosds:`
			`timeout: 1800`
			`chance_pgnum_grow: 1`
qa/suites: test pg merging Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com> 2018-04-07 19:59:54 +00:00			`chance_pgnum_shrink: 1`
erasure-code: lrc plugin workload Add a workload that uses the lrc erasure code plugin. Instead of adding it to suites/rados/thrash-erasure-code/workloads, a new suite is created at suites/rados/thrash-erasure-code-big because it needs more OSDs than other erasure code plugins. The alternative would be to increase the number of OSDs for all erasure code plugins, but that would needlessly increase the resources requirements. * cluster/12-osds.yaml creates a 12 OSDs, 3 MONs cluster * thrash-erasure-code-big/thrashers/.yaml are the same as thrash-erasure-code/thrashers/.yaml except they require that at least 8 OSDs are in at all times (instead of 4) because lrc PGs with k=4, m=2, l=3 are undersized if they do not have 8 OSDs. It is possible that crush fails to map 8 OSDs when only 8 OSDs are available, but that must not disturb the workload because min_size is 4. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11666 Fixes: #11666 Signed-off-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com> 2015-05-26 08:38:50 +00:00			`chance_pgpnum_fix: 1`
			`chance_test_map_discontinuity: 0.5`
			`min_in: 8`