8fe3a7bfd0
The travis CI does not have losetup with --partscan, skip the check in that case so we can still run the mkfs testsuite. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
cli-tests | ||
convert-tests | ||
fsck-tests | ||
fuzz-tests | ||
misc-tests | ||
mkfs-tests | ||
README.md | ||
build-tests.sh | ||
clean-tests.sh | ||
cli-tests.sh | ||
common | ||
common.convert | ||
common.local | ||
convert-tests.sh | ||
fsck-tests.sh | ||
fuzz-tests.sh | ||
misc-tests.sh | ||
mkfs-tests.sh | ||
scan-results.sh | ||
test-console.sh |
README.md
Btrfs-progs tests
A testsuite covering functionality of btrfs-progs, ie. the checker, image, mkfs
and similar tools. There are no additional requirements on kernel features
(other than CONFIG_BTRFS_FS
built-in or module), the
tests build on top of the core functionality like snapshots and device
management. In some cases optional features are turned on by mkfs and the
filesystem image could be mounted, such tests might fail if there's lack of
support.
Quick start
Run the tests from the top directory:
$ make test
$ make test-fsck
$ make test-convert
or selectively from the tests/
directory:
$ ./fsck-tests.sh
$ ./misc-tests.sh
The verbose output of the tests is logged into a file named after the test
category, eg. fsck-tests-results.txt
.
Selective testing
The test are prefixed by a number for ordering and uniqueness. To run a particular test use:
$ make TEST=MASK test
where MASK
is a glob expression that will execute only tests
that match the MASK. Here the test number comes handy:
$ make TEST=001\* test-fsck
$ TEST=001\* ./fsck-tests.sh
will run the first test in fsck-tests subdirectory.
Test structure
tests/fsck-tests/:
- tests targeted at bugs that are fixable by fsck
tests/convert-tests/:
- coverage tests of ext2/3/4 and btrfs-convert options
tests/fuzz-tests/:
- collection of fuzzed or crafted images
- tests that are supposed to run various utilities on the images and not crash
tests/cli-tests/:
- tests for command line interface, option coverage, weird option combinations that should not work
- not necessary to do any functional testing, could be rather lightweight
- functional tests should go to to other test dirs
- the driver script will only execute
./test.sh
in the test directory
tests/misc-tests/:
- anything that does not fit to the above, the test driver script will only
execute
./test.sh
in the test directory
tests/common: tests/common.convert:
- script with shell helpers, separated by functionality
tests/test.img:
- default testing image, the file is never deleted by the scripts but
truncated to 0 bytes, so it keeps it's permissions. It's eg. possible to
host it on NFS, make it
chmod a+w
for root.
Other tuning, environment variables
Instrumentation
It's possible to wrap the tested commands to utilities that might do more
checking or catch failures at runtime. This can be done by setting the
INSTRUMENT
environment variable:
INSTRUMENT=valgrind ./fuzz-tests.sh # in tests/
make INSTRUMENT=valgrind test-fuzz # in the top directory
The variable is prepended to the command unquoted, all sorts of shell tricks are possible.
Note: instrumentation is not applied to privileged commands (anything that uses the root helper).
Verbosity, test tuning
-
TEST_LOG=tty
-- setting the variable will print all commands executed by some of the wrappers (run_check
etc), other commands are not printed to the terminal (but the full output is in the log) -
TEST_LOG=dump
-- dump the entire testing log when a test fails -
TEST_ENABLE_OVERRIDE
-- defined either as make arguments or viatests/common.local
to enable additional arguments to some commands, using the variable(s) below (default: false, enable by setting to 'true') -
TEST_ARGS_CHECK
-- user-defined arguments tobtrfs check
, before the test-specific arguments
Multiple values can be separated by ,
.
Permissions
Some commands require root privileges (to mount/umount, access loop devices).
It is assumed that sudo
will work in some way (no password, password asked
and cached). Note that instrumentation is not applied in this case, for safety
reasons. You need to modify the test script instead.
Cleanup
The tests are supposed to cleanup after themselves if they pass. In case of failure, the rest of the tests are skipped and intermediate files, mounts and loop devices are kept. This should help to investigate the test failure but at least the mounts and loop devices need to be cleaned before the next run.
This is partially done by the script clean-tests.sh
, you may want to check
the loop devices as they are managed on a per-test basis.
Prototyping tests, quick tests
There's a script test-console.sh
that will run shell commands in a loop and
logs the output with the testing environment set up.
New test
-
Pick the category for the new test or fallback to
misc-tests
if not sure. For an easy start copy an existingtest.sh
script from some test that might be close to the purpose of your new test. The environment setup includes the common scripts and/or prepares the test devices. Other scripts contain examples how to do mkfs, mount, unmount, check, etc. -
Use the highest unused number in the sequence, write a short descriptive title and join by dashes
-
. This will become the directory name, eg.012-subvolume-sync-must-wait
. -
Write a short description of the bug and how it's tested to the comment at the begining of
test.sh
. You don't need to add the file to git yet. -
Write the test commands, comment anything that's not obvious.
-
Test your test. Use the
TEST
variable to jump right to your test:
$ make TEST=012\* tests-misc # from top directory
$ TEST=012\* ./misc-tests.sh # from tests/
- The commit changelog should reference a commit that either introduced or
fixed the bug (or both). Subject line of the shall mention the name of the
new directory for ease of search, eg.
btrfs-progs: tests: add 012-subvolume-sync-must-wait
Crafted/fuzzed images
Images that are create by fuzzing or specially crafted to trigger some error conditions should be added to the directory fuzz-tests/images, accompanied by a textual description of the source (bugzilla, mail), the reporter, brief description of the problem or the stack trace.
If you have a fix for the problem, please submit it prior to the test image, so the fuzz tests always succeed when run on random checked out. This helps bisectability.