Qu Wenruo 4e95d7d028 btrfs-progs: do not check ram_bytes for non-compressed data extents ... This patch reverts the following 3 commits: d0cc40d23a ("btrfs-progs: tests: add test case for ram_bytes detection and repair") 7313573c19 ("btrfs-progs: check: original, detect and repair ram_bytes mismatch") 97bf7a5969 ("btrfs-progs: check: lowmem, detect and repair mismatched ram_bytes") The problem with the ram_bytes check is, kernel can handle it without any problem, and the original objective for this is to detect such problem as I immaturelly believe the problem is fixed. But it turns out to be incorrect and this check is already causing problems. Fix it by doing a full revert for now. Pull-request: #828 Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>		2024-06-25 17:42:17 +02:00
..
common.h	btrfs-progs: add extra chunk alignment checks	2024-01-16 19:14:37 +01:00
main.c	btrfs-progs: do not check ram_bytes for non-compressed data extents	2024-06-25 17:42:17 +02:00
mode-common.c	btrfs-progs: reorder key initializations	2024-04-30 21:49:15 +02:00
mode-common.h	btrfs-progs: check: use bool for option status variables	2024-04-30 19:34:52 +02:00
mode-lowmem.c	btrfs-progs: do not check ram_bytes for non-compressed data extents	2024-06-25 17:42:17 +02:00
mode-lowmem.h	btrfs-progs: do not check ram_bytes for non-compressed data extents	2024-06-25 17:42:17 +02:00
mode-original.h	btrfs-progs: do not check ram_bytes for non-compressed data extents	2024-06-25 17:42:17 +02:00
qgroup-verify.c	btrfs-progs: reorder key initializations	2024-04-30 21:49:15 +02:00
qgroup-verify.h	btrfs-progs: check: update include lists	2022-10-11 09:06:12 +02:00
repair.c	btrfs-progs: reorder key initializations	2024-04-30 21:49:15 +02:00
repair.h	btrfs-progs: clean up includes, using include-what-you-use	2023-10-03 01:11:57 +02:00