.. BTRFS troubleshooting related pages index Troubleshooting pages ===================== Correctness related, permanent Error: parent transid verify error ---------------------------------- Reason: result of a failed internal consistency check of the filesystem's metadata. Type: permanent .. code-block:: [ 4007.489730] BTRFS error (device vdb): parent transid verify failed on 30736384 wanted 10 found 8 The b-tree nodes are linked together, a block pointer in the parent node contains target block offset and generation that last changed this block. The block it points to then upon read verifies that the block address and the generation matches. This check is done on all tree levels. The number in **faled on 30736384** is the logical block number, **wanted 10** is the expected generation number in the parent node, **found 8** is the one found in the target block. The number difference between the generation can give a hint when the problem could have happened, in terms of transaction commits. Once the mismatched generations are stored on the device, it's permanent and cannot be easily recovered, because of information loss. The recovery tool ``btrfs restore`` is able to ignore the errors and attempt to restore the data but due to the inconsistency in the metadata the data need to be verified by the user. The root cause of the error cannot be easily determined, possible reasons are: * logical bug: filesystem structures haven't been properly updated and stored * misdirected write: the underlying storage does not store the data to the exact address as expected and overwrites some other block * storage device (hardware or emulated) does not properly flush and persist data between transactions so they get mixed up * lost write without proper error handling: writing the block worked as viewed on the filesystem layer, but there was a problem on the lower layers not propagated upwards Error: No space left on device (ENOSPC) --------------------------------------- Type: transient Space handling on a COW filesystem is tricky, namely when it's in combination with delayed allocation, dynamic chunk allocation and parallel data updates. There are several reasons why the ENOSPC might get reported and there's not just a single cause and solution. The space reservation algorithms try to fairly assign the space, fall back to heuristics or block writes until enough data are persisted and possibly making old copies available. The most obvious way how to exhaust space is to create a file until the data chunks are full: .. code-block:: $ df -h . Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda 4.0G 3.6M 2.0G 1% /mnt/ $ cat /dev/zero > file cat: write error: No space left on device $ df -h . Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdc 4.0G 2.0G 0 100% /mnt/data250 $ btrfs fi df . Data, single: total=1.98GiB, used=1.98GiB System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=16.00KiB Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=2.22MiB GlobalReserve, single: total=3.25MiB, used=0.00B The data chunks have been exhausted, so there's really no space left where to write. The metadata chunks have space but that can't be used for that purpose. Metadata space got exhausted ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cannot track new data extents, no inline files, no reflinks, no xattrs. Deletion still works. Balance does not have enough workspace ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Relocation of block groups requires a temporary work space, ie. area on the device that's available for the filesystem but without any other existing block groups. Before balance starts a check is performed to verify the requested action is possible. If not, ENOSPC is returned. TODO ---- Transient - enospc - operation cannot be done Possibly both - checksum errors from changes on the medium under hands - transient because of direct io - stored from faulty data in memory