While syncing messages.[ch] I had to back out the ASSERT() code in
kerncompat.h, which means we now rely on the kernel code for ASSERT().
In order to maintain some semblance of separation introduce UASSERT()
and use that in all the purely userspace code.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[FALSE ALERT]
Unlike gcc, clang doesn't really understand the comments, thus it's
reportings tons of fall through related errors:
cmds/reflink.c:124:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
case 'r':
^
cmds/reflink.c:124:3: note: insert '__attribute__((fallthrough));' to silence this warning
case 'r':
^
__attribute__((fallthrough));
cmds/reflink.c:124:3: note: insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through
case 'r':
^
break;
[CAUSE]
Although gcc is fine with /* fallthrough */ comments, clang is not.
[FIX]
So just introduce a fallthrough macro to handle the situation properly,
and use that macro instead.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Switch the remaining use of assert() as it lacks the verbose assert that
we have for ASSERT (but otherwise is equivalent).
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In a few occasions there's an internal report, make a common helper so
the prefix message is not necessary and the stack trace can be printed
if enabled.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The tool IWYU (include what you use) suggests to remove and add some
includes. This is only partial to avoid accidental build breakage, the
includes are entangled and will have to be cleaned in the future again.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Josef Bacik
Qu Wenruo
David Sterba