Doing a straight 'make test' would fail because some misc and fsck
tests require particular tools to already be built. Add dependencies
at the Makefile and shell-script level.
Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <abuchbinder@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This is a kind of preparatory patch for the patch which will add
--rootid and --uuid options for the btrfs subvol show command.
As of now btrfs subvol show is using the external user provided subvol
path to show in the output. Which is kind of confusing.
btrfs su show /btrfs
/btrfs <--
Name: <FS_TREE>
It will be even more confusing when proposed --uuid or --rootid
options are used.
btrfs su show --rootid 258 /btrfs
/btrfs <--
Name: snap <--
UUID: 9630a45f-e647-4242-bd19-97590b4e20b2
Parent UUID: 30129358-c69d-3e4a-a662-29509cc69c95
Received UUID: -
Creation time: 2017-07-12 12:43:28 +0800
Subvolume ID: 258
Generation: 9
Gen at creation: 9
Parent ID: 257
Top level ID: 257
Flags: -
Snapshot(s):
Now with this patch, it will only show what is provided by the root_info.
btrfs su show --rootid 258 /btrfs
sv1/snap <--
Name: snap
UUID: 9630a45f-e647-4242-bd19-97590b4e20b2
Parent UUID: 30129358-c69d-3e4a-a662-29509cc69c95
Received UUID: -
Creation time: 2017-07-12 12:43:28 +0800
Subvolume ID: 258
Generation: 9
Gen at creation: 9
Parent ID: 257
Top level ID: 257
Flags: -
Snapshot(s):
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Making the code data-race safe requires that reads *and* writes
happen under a mutex lock, if any of the access are writes. See
Dmitri Vyukov, "Benign data races: what could possibly go wrong?"
for more details.
The fix here was to put most of the main loop of restore_worker
under a mutex lock.
This race was detected using fsck-tests/012-leaf-corruption.
==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race
Write of size 4 by main thread:
#0 add_cluster btrfs-progs/image/main.c:1931
#1 restore_metadump btrfs-progs/image/main.c:2566
#2 main btrfs-progs/image/main.c:2859
Previous read of size 4 by thread T6:
#0 restore_worker btrfs-progs/image/main.c:1720
Location is stack of main thread.
Thread T6 (running) created by main thread at:
#0 pthread_create <null>
#1 mdrestore_init btrfs-progs/image/main.c:1868
#2 restore_metadump btrfs-progs/image/main.c:2534
#3 main btrfs-progs/image/main.c:2859
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race btrfs-progs/image/main.c:1931 in
add_cluster
Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <abuchbinder@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The status display was reading the state while the task was updating
it. Use a mutex to prevent the race.
This race was detected using ThreadSanitizer and
misc-tests/005-convert-progress-thread-crash.
==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race
Write of size 8 by main thread:
#0 ext2_copy_inodes btrfs-progs/convert/source-ext2.c:853
#1 copy_inodes btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:145
#2 do_convert btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1297
#3 main btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1924
Previous read of size 8 by thread T1:
#0 print_copied_inodes btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:124
Location is stack of main thread.
Thread T1 (running) created by main thread at:
#0 pthread_create <null>
#1 task_start btrfs-progs/task-utils.c:50
#2 do_convert btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1295
#3 main btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1924
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race
btrfs-progs/convert/source-ext2.c:853 in ext2_copy_inodes
Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <abuchbinder@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 functions are involved in this refactor: btrfs_make_block_group()
btrfs_make_block_groups(), btrfs_alloc_chunk, btrfs_alloc_data_chunk().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
BTW, there is a duplicated definition of btrfs_add_device() in
volumes.h, also remove it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Just to keep the 1st paramter the same as kernel.
We can also save a few lines since the parameter is shorter now.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When checking chunk or dev extent, lowmem mode uses chunk length as dev
extent length, and if they mismatch, report missing chunk or dev extent
like:
------
ERROR: chunk[256 4324327424) stripe 0 did not find the related dev extent
ERROR: chunk[256 4324327424) stripe 1 did not find the related dev extent
ERROR: chunk[256 4324327424) stripe 2 did not find the related dev extent
------
However, only for Single/DUP/RAID1 profiles chunk length is the same as
dev extent length.
For other profiles, this will cause tons of false alert.
Fix it by using correct stripe length when checking chunk and dev extent
items.
This fixes the mkfs test failure when using lowmem mode check.
Reported-by: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce a new function, btrfs_get_chunk_stripe_len() to get correct
stripe length.
This is very handy for lowmem mode, which checks the mapping between
device extent and chunk item.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Before this patch, btrfs check lowmem mode manually checks found chunk
item, even we already have the generic chunk validation checker,
btrfs_check_chunk_valid().
This patch will use btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to replace open-coded
chunk validation checker in check_chunk_item().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_check_chunk_valid() doesn't check if
1) chunk flag has conflicting flags
For example chunk type DATA|METADATA|RAID1|RAID10 is completely
invalid, while current check_chunk_valid() can't detect it.
2) num_stripes is invalid for RAID10
Num_stripes 5 is not valid for RAID10.
This patch will enhance btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to handle above cases.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce a wrapper to recover raid56 data.
The logical is the same with kernel one, but with different interfaces,
since kernel ones cares the performance while in btrfs we don't care
that much.
And the interface is more caller friendly inside btrfs-progs.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Copied from kernel lib/raid6/recov.c.
Minor modifications includes:
- Rename from raid6_datap_recov_intx() to raid5_recov_datap()
- Rename parameter from faila to dest1
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Copied from kernel lib/raid6/recov.c raid6_2data_recov_intx1() function.
With the following modification:
- Rename to raid6_recov_data2() for shorter name
- s/kfree/free/g modification
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use kernel RAID6 galois tables for later RAID6 recovery.
Galois tables file, kernel-lib/tables.c is generated by user space
program, mktable.
Galois field tables declaration, in kernel-lib/raid56.h, is completely
copied from kernel.
The mktables.c is copied from kernel with minor header/macro
modification, to ensure the generated tables.c works well in
btrfs-progs.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce a new header, kernel-lib/raid56.h, for later raid56 works.
It contains 2 functions, from original btrfs-progs code:
void raid6_gen_syndrome(int disks, size_t bytes, void **ptrs);
int raid5_gen_result(int nr_devs, size_t stripe_len, int dest, void **data);
Will be expanded later and some part of it(RAID6 recover part) may keep
sync with kernel later.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ unify gpl header, rename header macro ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The only reasom read_tree_block() needs a btrfs_root parameter is to get
its node/sector size.
And long ago, I have already introduced a compactible interface,
read_tree_block_fs_info() to pass btrfs_fs_info instead of btrfs_root.
Since we have cleaned up all root->sector/node/stripesize users, we
should be OK to refactor read_tree_block() function.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Refactor the following functions and its callers to get rid of
incorrectly passed btrfs_root parameters:
1) corrupt_keys()
2) corrupt_metadata_block()
The only reason passing btrfs_root for them is to get block sizes.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
