When we are looking for extents in migrate_one_reserved_range, it's likely
that there will be multiple extents that fall into the 0-1MB range.
If lookup_cache_extent is called with a range that covers multiple cache
entries, it will return the first entry it encounters while searching
from the top of the tree that happens to fall in that range. That
means that we can end up skipping regions within that range, resulting
in a file system image that can't be rolled back since it wasn't
all migrated properly.
This is reproducible using convert-tests/008-readonly-image. There was
a range from 0-160kB, but the only entry that was returned began at
~ 280kB.
The fix is to use search_cache_extent to iterate through multiple regions
within that range.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are two printfs with missing newlines that end up making the
output wonky.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The status display was reading the state while the task was updating
it. Use a mutex to prevent the race.
This race was detected using ThreadSanitizer and
misc-tests/005-convert-progress-thread-crash.
==================
WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race
Write of size 8 by main thread:
#0 ext2_copy_inodes btrfs-progs/convert/source-ext2.c:853
#1 copy_inodes btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:145
#2 do_convert btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1297
#3 main btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1924
Previous read of size 8 by thread T1:
#0 print_copied_inodes btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:124
Location is stack of main thread.
Thread T1 (running) created by main thread at:
#0 pthread_create <null>
#1 task_start btrfs-progs/task-utils.c:50
#2 do_convert btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1295
#3 main btrfs-progs/convert/main.c:1924
SUMMARY: ThreadSanitizer: data race
btrfs-progs/convert/source-ext2.c:853 in ext2_copy_inodes
Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <abuchbinder@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
4 functions are involved in this refactor: btrfs_make_block_group()
btrfs_make_block_groups(), btrfs_alloc_chunk, btrfs_alloc_data_chunk().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In check_convert_image(), for normal HOLE case, if the file extents are
smaller than image size, we set ret to -EINVAL and print error message.
But forget to return.
This patch adds the missing return to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since btrfs_reserved_ranges array is just used to store btrfs reserved
ranges, no one will nor should modify them at run time, make them static
and const will be better.
This also eliminates the use of immediate number 3.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ definition stays in source-fs.c ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Rework rollback to a more easy to understand way.
New convert behavior makes us to have a more flex chunk layout, which
only data chunk containing old fs data will be at the same physical
location, while new chunks (data/meta/sys) can be mapped anywhere else.
This behavior makes old rollback behavior can't handle it.
As old behavior assumes all data/meta is mapped in a large chunk, which is
mapped 1:1 on disk.
So rework rollback to handle new convert behavior, enhance the check by
only checking all file extents of convert image, only to check if these
file extents and therir chunks are mapped 1:1.
This new rollback check behavior can handle both new and old convert
behavior, as the new behavior is a superset of old behavior.
Further more, introduce a simple rollback mechanisim:
1) Read reserved data (offset = file offset) from convert image
2) Write reserved data into disk (offset = physical offset)
Since old fs image is a valid fs, and we only need to rollback
superblocks (btrfs reserved ranges), then we just read out data in
reserved range, and write it back.
Due to the fact that all other file extents of converted image is mapped
1:1 on disk, we put the missing piece back, then the fs is as good as
old one.
Then what we do in btrfs is just another dream.
With this new rollback mechanisim, we can open btrfs read-only, so we
won't cause any damage to current btrfs, until the final piece (0~1M,
containing 1st super block) is put back.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ port to v4.10 ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce a function, check_convert_image() to check if that image is
rollback-able.
This means all file extents except one of the btrfs reserved ranges, must
be mapped 1:1 on disk.
1:1 mapped file extents must match the following conditions:
1) Their file_offset(key.offset) matches its disk_bytenr
2) The corresponding chunk must be mapped 1:1 on disk
That's to say, it's a SINGLE chunk, and chunk logical matches with
stripe physical.
Above 2 conditions ensured that file extent lies the exactly the same
position as in the old filesystem.
For data in reserved ranges of btrfs, they are relocated to new places,
and in that case, we use btrfs_read_file() to read out the content for
later rollback use.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Introduce a new function, read_reserved_ranges(), to allow later
rollback to use these data to do rollback.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Since we have reserved ranges array now, we can use them to skip all
these open codes.
And add some comment and asciidoc art for related part.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ port to v4.10 ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Convert is now a little complex due to that fact we need to separate
metadata and data chunks for different profiles.
Add a comment with ascii art explaining the whole design and point
out the really complex part, so any newcomers interested in convert can
get a quick overview of it before digging into the hard to read code.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ wording and formatting adjustments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use one flag field instead of several variables. The change cascades
down to the callchain and modifies several functions.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The context is zeroed in convert_open_fs after and overwrites the rbtree
initialization, which accidentally is the same (NULL).
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The regulare mkfs_btrfs does not anything special about convert and just
passes the arguments. Make that two functions.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If we specify NO_HOLES incompat feature when converting, the result
image still uses hole file extents.
And further more, the hole is incorrect as its disk_num_bytes is not
zero.
The problem is at btrfs_insert_file_extent() which doesn't check if we
are going to insert hole file extent.
Modify it to skip hole file extents to allow it follow restrict NO_HOLES
flag.
And since no_holes flag can be triggered on half-way, so current fsck
won't report such error, as it consider it as old file holes.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
migrate_super_block() uses sectorsize to refer to the size of the
superblock. Hence on 64k sectorsize filesystems, it ends up computing
checksum beyond the super block length (i.e.
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE). This commit fixes the bug by using
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE instead of sectorsize of the underlying
filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When looping across data block bitmap, __ext2_add_one_block() may add
blocks which do not exist on the underlying disk. This commit prevents
this from happening by checking the block index against the maximum
block count that was present in the ext4 filesystem instance that is
being converted.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
