Remove parameters @trans of delete_extent_item() and walk_down_tree_v2().
Note: This patch and next patches cause error in lowmem repair like:
"Error: Commit_root already set when starting transaction".
Such error will disappear after removing @trans finished.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch removes parameter @trans of repair_tree_back_ref().
It calls try_avoid_extents_overwrite() and starts a transaction by
itself.
Note: This patch and next patches cause error in lowmem repair like:
"Error: Commit_root already set when starting transaction".
Such error will disappear after removing @trans finished.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch removes parameter @trans of check_leaf_items().
Note: This patch and next patches cause error in lowmem repair like:
"Error: Commit_root already set when starting transaction".
Such error will disappear after removing @trans finished.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch removes parameter @trans of repair_extent_item().
It calls try_avoid_extents_overwrite() and starts a transaction by
itself.
Note: This patch and next patches cause error in lowmem repair like:
"Error: Commit_root already set when starting transaction".
Such error will disappear after removing @trans finished.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch removes parameter @trans of repair_chunk_item().
It calls try_avoid_extents_overwrite() and starts a transaction by
itself.
Note: This patch and next patches cause error in lowmem repair like:
"Error: Commit_root already set when starting transaction".
Such error will disappear after removing @trans finished.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch removes the parameter @trans of delete_extent_item().
It calls try_avoid_extents_overwrite() and starts a transaction
by itself.
Note: This patch and next patches cause error in lowmem repair like:
"Error: Commit_root already set when starting transaction".
Such error will disappear after removing @trans finished.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since extents can be avoided to be overwrittten by excluding or chunk
allocation. It's not necessary to do all repairs in one transaction.
This patch removes parameter @trans of repair_extent_data_item().
repair_extent_data_item() calls try_avoid_extents_overwrite()
and starts a transaction by itself.
Note: This patch and next patches cause error in lowmem repair like:
"Error: Commit_root already set when starting transaction".
Such error will disappear after removing @trans finished.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If options '--init-extent-tree' and '--mode=lowmem' are both
input, all metadata blocks will be traversed twice.
First one is done by pin_metadata_blocks() in reinit_extent_tree().
Second one is in check_chunks_and_extents_v2().
Excluding instead of pinning metadata blocks before reinitializing th
extent tree in lowmem can save some time.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Declare a global u64 variable last_allocated_chunk records start of
the last chunk allocated by lowmem repair.
Although global variable is not nice, it simplifies the code a lot.
avoid_extents_overwrite() prefers to allocate a new chunk first.
If it failed because of no space or wrong used bytes (like in
fsck-tests/004), then it tries to exclude metadata blocks which costs
a lot of time in large filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce create_chunk_and_block_block_group() to allocate a new chunk
and corresponding block group.
The new function force_cow_in_new_chunk() firstly allocates new chunk
and records its start.
Then it modifies all metadata block groups cached and full.
Finally it marks the new block group uncached and unfree.
In the next COW, extents states will be updated automatically by
cache_block_group().
New function try_to_force_cow_in_new_chunk() will try to mark block
groups full, allocate a new chunk and records the start.
If the last allocated chunk is almost full, a new chunk will be
allocated.
Suggested-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Excluding or pining all metadata blocks is time-inefficient for large
filesystems. Here is another way to mark all metadata block groups full
and allocate new chunks for COW. Then new reserved extents never
overwrite extents.
Introduce modify_block_groups_cache() to modify all blocks groups
cache state and set all extents in block groups unfree in free space
cache.
mark/clear_block_groups_full() are wrappers of above function.
Suggested-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The variable @eb is assigned to leaf in fs_tree before insertion of
backref. It will cause wrong parent of new inserted backref.
Set @parent at beginning to fix the problem.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In lowmem mode with '--repair', check_chunks_and_extents_v2 will fix
accounting in block groups and clear the error bit BG_ACCOUNTING_ERROR.
However, return value of check_btrfs_root() doesn't contain error bits.
If extent tree is on error, lowmem repair always prints error and
returns nonzero value even the filesystem is fine after repair.
Introduce FATAL_ERROR for lowmem mode to represent negative return
values since negative and positive can't be mixed in the bit operations.
Then let check_btrfs_root() return error bits.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In repair_extent_data_item(), path is not released if some errors occurs
which causes extent buffer leak.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For repair_ternary_lowmem() used in lowmem mode, if it found 1 of
DIR_INDEX/DIR_ITEM/INODE_REF missing, it will try to insert correct
link.
However for case like invalid type in DIR_INDEX, we should delete the
corrupted DIR_INDEX first before inserting the correct link.
This patch will remove the corrupted link before re-inserting.
This should solve the duplicated DIR_INDEX problem in old lowmem mode
repair.
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of struct btrfs_root, use struct btrfs_fs_info, since nodesize
is now a per-fs setting, and with the need to pass a @root, caller don't
need to wonder which root should be passed.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Under some cases the filesystem checker reports an error when it finds
checksum items for an extent that is referenced by an inode as a prealloc
extent. Such cases are not an error when the extent is actually shared
(was cloned/reflinked) with other inodes and was written through one of
those other inodes.
Example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ touch /mnt/foo
$ xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256K" /mnt/foo
$ sync
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 256K" /mnt/foo
$ touch /mnt/bar
$ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/foo 0 0 256K" /mnt/bar
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/bar
<power fail>
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ umount /mnt
$ btrfs check /dev/sdc
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb
UUID: 52d3006e-ee3b-40eb-aa21-e56253a03d39
checking extents
checking free space cache
checking fs roots
root 5 inode 257 errors 800, odd csum item
ERROR: errors found in fs roots
found 688128 bytes used, error(s) found
total csum bytes: 256
total tree bytes: 163840
total fs tree bytes: 65536
total extent tree bytes: 16384
btree space waste bytes: 138819
file data blocks allocated: 10747904
referenced 10747904
$ echo $?
1
So teach check to not report such cases as errors by checking if the
extent is shared with other inodes and if so, consider it an error the
existence of checksum items only if all those other inodes are referencing
the extent as a prealloc extent.
This case can be hit often when running the generic/475 testcase from
fstests.
A test case will follow in a separate patch.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Btrfs can delay inode deletion and in that case btrfs will unlink the
victim inode from its parent dir, and insert a marker to info btrfs to
delete it later.
In that case, such victim inode will have nlinks == 0, but is still
completely valid.
Original mode won't report such problem, but lowmem mode doesn't check
the ORPHAN_ITEM key for such inode, and can report false alert like:
------
ERROR: root 257 INODE[28891726] is orphan item
------
Fix such false alert by checking orphan item for inode whose nlink is 0.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Btrfs lowmem check reports the following false alert:
------
ERROR: file extent[267 2162688] root 256 owner 5 backref lost
------
The file extent is in the leaf which is shared by file tree 256 and fs
tree.
------
leaf 30605312 items 46 free space 4353 generation 7 owner 5
......
item 45 key (267 EXTENT_DATA 2162688) itemoff 5503 itemsize 53
generation 7 type 2 (prealloc)
prealloc data disk byte 13631488 nr 65536
prealloc data offset 32768 nr 32768
------
And there is the corresponding extent_data_ref item in the extent tree.
------
item 1 key (13631488 EXTENT_DATA_REF 1007496934287921081) itemoff 15274 itemsize 28
extent data backref root 5 objectid 267 offset 2129920 count 1
------
The offset of EXTENT_DATA_REF which is the hash of the owner root objectid,
the inode number and the calculated offset (file offset - extent offset).
What caused the false alert is the code mix up the owner root objectid and
the file tree objectid.
Fixes: b0d360b541 ("btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check data backref in extent tree")
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of the disk_bytenr and disk_num_bytes of the extent_item which the
file extent references, we should output the objectid and offset of the
file extent. And the leaf may be shared by the file trees, we should print
the objectid of the root and the owner of the leaf.
Fixes: b0d360b541 ("btrfs-progs: check: introduce function to check data backref in extent tree")
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
