[BUG]
During fuzz/007 we hit the following error:
====== RUN MAYFAIL btrfs rescue super-recover -y -v tests/fuzz-tests/images/bko-200409.raw.restored.scratch
ERROR: tree_root block unaligned: 33554431
ERROR: superblock checksum matches but it has invalid members
ERROR: tree_root block unaligned: 33554431
ERROR: superblock checksum matches but it has invalid members
ERROR: tree_root block unaligned: 33554431
ERROR: superblock checksum matches but it has invalid members
ERROR: failed to add chunk map start=12582912 len=8454144: -17 (File exists)
Couldn't read chunk tree
failed (ignored, ret=139): btrfs rescue super-recover -y -v tests/fuzz-tests/images/bko-200409.raw.restored.scratch
mayfail: returned code 139 (SEGFAULT), not ignored
test failed for case 007-simple-super-recover
[CAUSE]
In __open_ctree_fd(), if we have valid @open_ctree_flags and
btrfs_scan_fs_devices() succeeds without problems, no matter what
happens we will call btrfs_close_devices(), thus free all related
devices.
In super-recover, before we call open_ctree(), we have called
btrfs_scan_fs_devices() already, so btrfs_scan_fs_devices() should not
fail in open_ctree(), fs_devices will always be freed in open_ctree() or
close_ctree().
[FIX]
So in super-recover.c, we should not call btrfs_close_devices(), or we
will find fs_devices->list freed, and trigger segfault when exiting.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit 3296d058b7 ("btrfs-progs: super-recover: Reuse
btrfs_read_dev_super function") changed the logic when a superblock
is added to the bad block list to depend on -EIO. However currently
btrfs_read_dev_super doesn't return -EIO when the fist super block
is broken. Instead it returns -1. This causes the super-recovery
logic to miss the fact that the first super block is completely broken.
Fix this by considering any error code from btrfs_read_dev_super other
than -ENOENT to mean that the super block is corrupted. -ENOENT
means that the superblock copy is not part of the fs i.e. it's smaller
than the offset of the block. This can only occur for the 2nd copy at
256gb mark.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently getting the good super really consists of just getting the
first entry on the linked list, since it's the one with the highest
transid. So remove the function and just use list_first_entry directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function has been copied twice in chunk-recover and super-recover. Factor
it out into utils.c/h and use it. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have enhanced super block validation check in disk_io.c, while
super-recover doesn't use that function and use a custom one.
That is duplicated, so reuse btrfs_read_dev_super to handle it, which
not only enhanced super check, but also reduce the code length.
Reported-by: hawken <hawken@thehawken.org>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When we go to fixup the dev items after a restore we scan all existing devices.
If you happen to be a btrfs developer you could possibly open up some random
device that you didn't just restore onto, which gives you weird errors and makes
you super cranky and waste a day trying to figure out what is failing. This
will make it so that we use the fd we've already opened for opening our ctree.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
glibc 2.10+ (5+ years old) enables all the desired features:
_XOPEN_SOURCE 700, __XOPEN2K8, POSIX_C_SOURCE, DEFAULT_SOURCE; with a
single _GNU_SOURCE define in the makefile alone. For portability to
other libc implementations (e.g. dietlibc) _XOPEN_SOURCE=700 is also
defined.
This also resolves Debian bug report filed by Michael Tautschnig -
"Inconsistent use of _XOPEN_SOURCE results in conflicting
declarations". Whilst I was not able to reproduce the results, the
reported fact is that _XOPEN_SOURCE set to 500 in one set of files
(e.g. cmds-filesystem.c) generates/defines different struct stat from
other files (cmds-replace.c).
This patch thus cleans up all feature defines, and sets them at a
consistent level.
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747969
Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.j.ledkov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
As of now commands mentioned below (with in [..]) are calling call register-device
ioctl BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV for all the devices in the system.
Some issues with it:
BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV: ioctl is a write operation, we don't want command like
btrfs-debug-tree threads to do that..
eg:
----
$ cat /proc/fs/btrfs/devlist | egrep fsid | wc -l
0
$ btrfs-debug-tree /dev/sde (num_device > 1)
$ cat /proc/fs/btrfs/devlist | egrep fsid | wc -l
5
----
btrfs_scan_fs_devices() ends up calling this ioctl only when num_device > 1.
That's inconsistency with in feature/bug.
We don't have to register _all_ the btrfs devices (again) in the system
without user consent.
Why its inconsistent:
function btrfs_scan_fs_devices() calls btrfs_scan_lblkid only when
num_devices is > 1, which in turn calls BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV ioctl, if
conditions are met.
But main issue is we have too many consumers of btrfs_scan_fs_devices()
the names below with in [] is the cli leading to this function.
open_ctree_broken() [btrfs-find-root]
recover_prepare() [btrfs rescue super-recover]
__open_ctree_fd
(updates always except when flag OPEN_CTREE_RECOVER_SUPER is set and
flag OPEN_CTREE_RECOVER_SUPER is set only by 'btrfs rescue super-
recover' but still this thread sneaks through the open_ctree function
to call register-device-ioctl as show below).
open_ctree_fs_info
[btrfs-debug-tree]
[btrfs-image -r]
[btrfs check]
open_fs
[btrfs restore]
open_ctree
[calc-size]
[btrfs-corrupt-block]
[btrfs-image] (create)
[btrfs-map-logical]
[btrfs-select-super]
[btrfstune]
[btrfs-zero-log]
[tester]
[mkfs]
[quick-test.c]
[btrfs label set unmounted]
[btrfs get label unmounted]
[btrfs rescue super-recover]
open_ctree_fd
[btrfs-convert]
Fix:
In an effort to make register-device consistent, all calls to
btrfs_scan_fs_devices() will have 5th parameter set to 0. that means
we don't need 5th parameter at all. And with this function not calling
the register ioctl at all, finally we will have following two cli to call
the ioctl BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV.
btrfs dev scan and
mkfs.btrfs
Threads needing to update kernel about a device would have to use
btrfs_register_one_device() separately.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
super-recover collects btrfs devices infomation using existed
functions scan_one_devices().
Problem is fs_devices is freed twice in close_ctree() and
free_recover_superblock() for super correction path.
Fix this problem by checking whether fs_devices memory
have been freed before we free it.
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Acked-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Btrfs-progs superblock checksum check is somewhat too restricted for
super-recover, since current btrfs-progs will only read the 1st
superblock and if you need super-recover the 1st superblock is
possibly already damaged.
The fix is introducing super_recover parameter for
btrfs_read_dev_super() and callers to allow scan backup superblocks if
needed.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Fix corporate name for copyright.
Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
So I needed to add a flag to not try to read block groups when doing
--init-extent-tree since we could hang there, but that meant adding a whole
other 0/1 type flag to open_ctree_fs_info. So instead I've converted it all
over to using a flags setting and added the flag that I needed. This has been
tested with xfstests and make test. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Until now if one of device's first superblock is corrupt,btrfs will
fail to mount. Luckily, btrfs have at least two superblocks for
every disk.
In theory, if silent corrupting happens when we are writting superblocks
into disk, we must hold at least one good superblock.
One side effect is that user must gurantee that the disk must be
a btrfs disk. Otherwise, this tool may destroy other fs.(This is also
reason why btrfs only use first superblock in every disk to mount)
This little program will try to correct bad superblocks from
good superblocks with max generation.
There will be five kinds of return values:
0: all supers are valid, no need to recover
1: usage or syntax error
2: recover all bad superblocks successfully
3: fail to recover bad superblocks
4: abort to recover bad superblocks
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Qu Wenruo
Nikolay Borisov
Qu Wenruo
Domagoj Tršan
David Sterba
Nicholas D Steeves
Josef Bacik
Dimitri John Ledkov
Anand Jain
Wang Shilong
Hidetoshi Seto
Josef Bacik
Wang Shilong