Previously, no filenames/xattrs would be printed with --nofilename, but
to keep the format of dump, print a placeholder instead of all names.
This is:
* directory entries (files, directories, subvolumes)
* default subvolume
* extended attributes (name, value)
* hardlink names if stored inside another item
Note that lengths are not hidden because they can be calculated from the
item size anyway.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In the mail list, it's pretty common that a developer is asking dump tree
output from the reporter, it's better to protect those kind reporters by
hiding the filename if the reporter wants.
This option will skip @name/@data output for the following items:
- DIR_INDEX
- DIR_ITEM
- INODE_REF
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Discovered with cppcheck. Fix signed/unsigned int mismatches, sizeof and
long formats.
Pull-request: #197
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
So when searching for BTRFS_DEV_ITEMS_OBJECTID, it hits, albeit it is
defined same as BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
GCC 9.1.0 will report the following error when compiling btrfs-progs:
In file included from print-tree.c:24:
ctree.h: In function 'btrfs_dev_stats_values':
ctree.h:2408:9: warning: taking address of packed member of 'struct btrfs_dev_stats_item' may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
2408 | return p->values;
| ^
[FIX]
Follow the kernel way of accessing dev stats by using
btrfs_dev_stats_value(eb, ptr, index).
So that we don't need to bother accessing the packed member.
This also unifies the helper function in kernel and btrfs-progs.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
GCC9 9.1.1 with -Waddress-of-packed-member warns about passing an
unaligned pointer from btrfs_dev_stats_values. It is up to the caller to
access the array properly, which does happen in print_dev_stats.
In file included from print-tree.c:24:
ctree.h: In function ‘btrfs_dev_stats_values’:
ctree.h:2408:9: warning: taking address of packed member of ‘struct btrfs_dev_stats_item’ may result in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
2408 | return p->values;
Drop the helper as print-tree.c is the only user and access the dev stat
values using the unaligned helper.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
BTRFS_COMPAT_EXTENT_TREE_V0 is introduced for a short time in kernel,
and it's over 10 years ago.
Nowadays there should be no user for that feature, and kernel has remove
this support in Jun, 2018. There is no need for btrfs-progs to support
it.
This patch will remove EXTENT_TREE_V0 related code and replace those
BUG_ON() to a more graceful error message.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Originally print-tree uses depth first search to print trees.
This works fine until we reach 3 level trees (root node level is 2).
For tall trees whose root level is 2 or higher, DFS will mix nodes and
leaves like the following example:
Level 2 A
/ \
Level 1 B C
/ | | \
Level 0 D E F G
DFS will cause the following output sequence:
A B D E C F G
Which in term of node/leave is:
N N L L N L L
Such mixed node/leave result is sometimes hard for human to read.
This patch will introduce 2 new options, --bfs and --dfs.
--dfs: keeps the original output sequence, and to keep things
compatible it's the default behavior.
--bfs: uses breadth-first search, and will cause better output
sequence like:
A B C D E F G
Which in term of node/leave is:
N N N L L L L
Much better sorted and may become default in the future.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce a new function, bfs_print_children(), to do breadth-first
search to print a node.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When printing tree nodes, we output slots like:
key (EXTENT_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0) block 73625600 (17975) gen 16
The number in the parentheses is blockptr / nodesize.
However this number doesn't really do anything useful. And in fact for
unaligned metadata block group (block group start bytenr is not aligned
to 16K), the number doesn't even make sense as it's rounded down.
In fact kernel doesn't ever output such divided result in its
print-tree.c
Remove it so later reader won't wonder what the number means.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
If one uncompressed inline extent has incorrect ram_bytes, neither btrfs
check nor dump-tree could detect such corruption.
[CAUSE]
Every caller tries to read inline extent ram_bytes is using
btrfs_file_extent_inline_len(), other than directly calling
btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes().
For compressed extent, it's just calling btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes().
However for uncompressed extent, it falls back to
btrfs_file_extent_inline_item_len(), makes us unable to detect anything
wrong in ram_bytes.
[FIX]
Just get rid of such confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() function.
Reported-by: Steve Leung <sjleung@shaw.ca>
Tested-by: Steve Leung <sjleung@shaw.ca>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since the out label has been deleted, this free_extent_buffer will never
be executed.
Fixes: f37ae8d275 ("btrfs-progs: print-tree: Enhance warning on tree block level mismatch and error handling")
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Print tree name instead of number to make output more readable.
Example:
[before]
extent data backref root 5 objectid 257 offset 16384 count 1
tree block backref root 18446744073709551607
[after]
extent data backref root FS_TREE objectid 257 offset 16384 count 1
tree block backref root DATA_RELOC_TREE
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Offset of extent data backref in extent item can be negative.
So, let's use %lld insteand of %llu to output readable value.
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For btrfs_print_tree(), if nr_items is corrupted, it can easily go
beyond extent buffer boundary.
Add extra nr_item check, and only print as many valid slots as possible.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For btrfs_print_tree() and btrfs_print_leaf(), the usage of fs_info is
mainly for nodesize and sectorsize.
However for nodesize, we can get it from @eb->len without the need for
fs_info at all.
For nodesize, introduce new helper BTRFS_NODEPTR_PER_EXTENT_BUFFER() to
get nodesize from @eb directly.
And with the help of previous modified btrfs_leaf_free_space(),
btrfs_print_tree() can live without fs_info at all.
For btrfs_print_leaf(), we modify print_extent_csum() to accept NULL
fs_info by skipping csum length calculation.
With all these modification, btrfs_print_tree/leaf() can be called
without accessing @fs_info at all, and make it more flexible to handle
binary tree block dump, or inside gdb.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For btrfs_leaf_free_space(), to get leaf data size, we have two way to
get it:
1) leaf->fs_info->nodesize
2) leaf->len
Anyway, we could get rid of @fs_info parameter for
btrfs_leaf_free_space().
And here we choose method 2), as it provides extra benefit to get leaf
free space without initializing a real fs_info.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Normally corrupted leaf should be caught by csum check, but sometimes
corrupted item pointers (out of leaf range) can still pass csum check.
In fact, our fsck/005 test case image has such corrupted item pointer
and btrfs check can surprisingly fix it.
Anyway, make print-tree to skip such item and remaining slots to avoid
segfault.
Please note that, in btrfs-progs we can't put such check into
check_tree_block() nor do kernel level comprehensive check as under
certain case, btrfs-progs can handle or even repair it.
A strict check_tree_block() or backporting kernel btrfs_check_leaf()
could break such test cases and reduce the utility of btrfs-progs.
Issue: #128
Reported-by: Hubert Kario <hubert@kario.pl>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Just like kernel cleanup made by David, btrfs_print_leaf() and
btrfs_print_tree() doesn't need btrfs_root parameter at all.
With previous patches as preparation, now we can remove the btrfs_root
parameter.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of struct btrfs_root, use struct btrfs_fs_info, since nodesize
is now a per-fs setting, and with the need to pass a @root, caller don't
need to wonder which root should be passed.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently we print the raw values of the owner field of leaf/nodes.
This can result in output like the following:
leaf 30490624 items 2 free space 16061 generation 4 owner 18446744073709551607
With the patch applied the same leaf looks like:
leaf 30490624 items 2 free space 16061 generation 4 owner DATA_RELOC_TREE
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch enhances the tree block level mismatch by the following
methods:
1) Merge same warning branches into one
We had two branches showing the same message, and their condition
is also the same. Merge them
2) Only skip bad slot
The old code skipped all the remaining slots, here we just skip one
slot to output as many correct tree blocks as possible.
3) Enhance warning message
Output the parent bytenr and expected and wrong level, so we don't
need to refer to stdout to get which tree block is corrupted.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit Fixes: 8c36786c81 ("btrfs-progs: print-tree: Print offset as
tree objectid for ROOT_ITEM") changes how we translate offset of
ROOT_ITEM.
However the fact is, even for ROOT_ITEM, we have different meaning of
offset.
For tree reloc tree, it's indeed subvolume id. But for other trees,
it's the transid of when it's created.
Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
dump-tree prints wrong sequence number and the flags numbers,
as we misplaced the printf args. This patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Do a cleanup. Also make it consistent with kernel. Use fs_info instead
of root for BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK, since maybe in some situation we
do not know root, but just know fs_info.
To be consistent with kernel, change macro to inline function.
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently ctime/otime/stime/rtime of ROOT_ITEM are not printed in
print_root_item(). Fix this and print them if the values are not zero.
The function print_timespec() is moved forward to reuse.
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For cases like reloc trees and subvolume trees, their key offset is the
tree id. The key will be printed as:
(TREE_RELOC ROOT_ITEM 18446744073709551607)
The negative number is long and even guys with real engineer brains
can't easily get the meaning.
This patch will change the output format to:
(TREE_RELOC ROOT_ITEM DATA_RELOC_TREE)
While for special offset value like 0 or (u64)-1, it's still shown as
is.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
[ reword comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Sparse warns
print-tree.c:1261:49: warning: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types)
print-tree.c:1261:49: expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] start
print-tree.c:1261:49: got restricted __le64 [addressable] [usertype] offset
which means we have to use the helper instead of directly accessing the offset
member. This could print bogus number on bigendian arch.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Adds zstd support to the btrfs program. An optional dependency on libzstd
>= 1.0.0 is added. Autoconf accepts `--enable-zstd' or `--disable-zstd' and
defaults to detecting if libzstd is present using `pkg-config'.
The patch is also available in my fork of btrfs-progs [1], which passes
Travis-CI with the new tests. The prebuilt binary is available there.
I haven't updated Android.mk.
[1] https://github.com/terrelln/btrfs-progs/tree/devel
Signed-off-by: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
While looking at a log of a corrupted fs I needed to verify we were
missing csums for a given range. Make this easier by printing out the
range of bytes a csum item covers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In some cases it's clear from the context which item is being printed,
so we can remove them. If the item has no data, some description is
still desired (eg. orphan or various backrefs).
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
David Sterba
Qu Wenruo
Rosen Penev
Anand Jain
Josh Soref
Lu Fengqi
Misono Tomohiro
Nikolay Borisov
Gu Jinxiang
Nick Terrell
Zhang Yu
Josef Bacik