We can deal with corrupt items by deleting them in a few cases. Fsck can easily
recover from a missing extent item or a dir index item. So if we notice a item
is completely bogus and it is of a key that we know we can repair then just
delete it and carry on. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
A user had a corrupted fs where the items had been shifted improperly. This
patch adds the ability to fix this sort of problem within fsck. We will simply
shift the item over to the proper offset and update the offsets to make sure
they are correct. I tested this with a hand crafted fs that was broken in the
same way as the user, and I've included the file as a new test. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
If we have an inode backref entry then we know enough to add back a missing dir
index. When messing with the inode backrefs we need to do all of that first
before we process the inode recs themselves as we may clear errors on the inode
recs as we fix the directory indexes. This adds the framework for fixing
backref errors and fixes missing dir index issues. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
It is highly obnoxious to have to go put in a testdev when all you really want
is to run the quick image tests. Make this part optional so if we don't have a
testdev specified we just don't run that particular test. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
We need test to verify extent tree rebuilding work, this test
create a strange filesystem with some snapshots, destroy
extent root node, and run fsck with "--init-extent-tree".
Since this tests need btrfs internal tool(btrfs-corrupt-block),so
i add this test into btrfs-progs.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
On my system, this brings the FS conversion test suite's runtime from over
ten seconds down to under two.
Thanks to Julien Muchembled for the suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <abuchbinder@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
These use the system's mke2fs, and don't require loop devices
or root privileges.
They don't pick up anything with the default flags right now,
but they do pick up some sanitizer issues when the tools are
compiled with any of -fsanitize={address,memory,thread}.
Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <abuchbinder@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
This is a verification test for the transid recow functionality of btrfsck.
I've also adjusted the test script to spit out which image it's testing so I can
be sure the image was getting tested. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We need to start adding some sanity tests to btrfs-progs to make sure we aren't
breaking things with our patches. The most important of these tools is btrfsck.
This patch gets things started by adding a basic btrfsck test that makes sure we
can fix a corruption problem we know we can fix. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
