Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Josef Bacik 2681e00f00 btrfs-progs: check for matching free space in cache
We have this check in the kernel but not in userspace, which makes fsck
fail when we wouldn't have a problem in the kernel.  This was meant to
catch this case because it really isn't good, unfortunately it will
require a design change to fix in the kernel so in the meantime add this
check so we can be sure our tests only catch real problems.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2015-04-24 15:42:04 +02:00
Qu Wenruo 97bf00f595 btrfs-progs: Remove a unused function offset_to_bitmap()
Fix the following clang warning:

free-space-cache.c:464:19: warning: unused function 'offset_to_bitmap'
[-Wunused-function]
static inline u64 offset_to_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
                  ^
1 warning generated.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-12-19 15:05:01 +01:00
David Sterba 2c0e02a568 btrfs-progs: make free space checker work on non-4k sectorsize filesystems
The value of sector for space cache was hardcoded to 4k, and used to
calculate bitmap sizes.  In kernel, the BITS_PER_BITMAP is derived from
PAGE_CACHE_SIZE which is not available for userspace, that can also deal
with filesystem of varying sectorsize.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-10 10:38:31 +02:00
Gui Hecheng 978542ff59 btrfs-progs: clean fsck noise for free inode generation 0
When we write a btrfs to full and then we have no space left for
free space cache.
The btrfs check will output msg as follows which is noise indeed:
	# free space inode generation (0) did not match
	  free space cache generation (XXX)

When the free space cache is not written out normally,
the free inode generation will be 0.
In this condition, no noise should be outputed.
Also, check 0-sized inode eariler together with 0-generationed inode.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-08-22 14:43:09 +02:00
Gui Hecheng 1500c52c75 btrfs-progs: cleanup nonsense ret value assignment
The "ret" will be soon used to hold the return value of another function,
assign -1 to it before is nonsense.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 06:23:16 -07:00
Eryu Guan b2e99e1819 Btrfs-progs: check return value of read_tree_block() in check_chunks_and_extents()
The following steps could trigger btrfs segfault:

mkfs -t btrfs -m raid5 -d raid5 /dev/loop{0..3}
losetup -d /dev/loop2
btrfs check /dev/loop0

The reason is that read_tree_block() returns NULL and
add_root_to_pending() dereferences it without checking it first.

Also replace a BUG_ON with proper error checking.

Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:22:25 -08:00
Gui Hecheng 3cae13ee93 btrfs-progs: remove NULL-ptr judge before free for btrfs-progs
free(3) already checks the pointer for NULL, no need to do it
on your own. This patch make the change globally.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-31 08:22:17 -08:00
Zach Brown d1dc091980 btrfs-progs: make many private symbols static
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-03 19:41:08 +02:00
Eric Sandeen 989ca65a11 btrfs-progs: mark static & remove unused from shared kernel code
In files copied from the kernel, mark many functions as static,
and remove any resulting dead code.

Some functions are left unmarked if they aren't static in the
kernel tree.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-03 19:40:53 +02:00
Eric Sandeen 4e8c4d4ba7 btrfs-progs: drop unused parameter from btrfs_release_path
Port of commit b3b4aa7 to userspace.

parameter tree root it's not used since commit
5f39d397dfbe140a14edecd4e73c34ce23c4f9ee ("Btrfs: Create extent_buffer
interface for large blocksizes")

This gets userspace a tad closer to kernelspace by removing
this unused parameter that was all over the codebase...

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-03 19:40:46 +02:00
Josef Bacik f5201efdb0 Btrfs-progs: add a newline to a free space cache message
Left out a newline in the generation check printf.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-06-19 13:52:28 -04:00
Josef Bacik c6eb10a7a4 Btrfs-progs: init free space ctl with proper unit
btrfsck was blowing up when checking the free space cache when we ran xfstests
with -l 64k.  That is because I was init'ing the free space ctl to whatever the
leafsize was, which isn't right for data block groups.  With this patch btrfsck
no longer complains.  This also fixes a tiny little typo in free-space-cache.c I
noticed while figuring this problem out.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-05-06 13:41:58 -04:00
Josef Bacik d93cad2677 Btrfs-progs: add a free space cache checker to fsck V2
In trying to track down a weird tree log problem I wanted to make sure that the
free space cache was actually valid, which we currently have no way of doing.
So this patch adds a bunch of support for the free space cache code and then a
checker to fsck.  Basically we go through and if we can actually load the free
space cache then we will walk the extent tree and verify that the free space
cache exactly matches what is in the extent tree.  Hopefully this will always be
correct, the only time it wouldn't is if the extent tree is corrupt or we have
some sort of awful bug in the free space cache.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-04-23 18:56:21 +02:00