Introduce a new macro, BTRFS_SB_OFFSET() to calculate backup superblock
offset, this is handy if one wants to initialize static array at
declaration time.
Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Large numbers like (1024 * 1024 * 1024) may cost reader/reviewer to
waste one second to convert to 1G.
Introduce kernel include/linux/sizes.h to replace any intermediate
number larger than 4096 (not including 4096) to SZ_*.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The regulare mkfs_btrfs does not anything special about convert and just
passes the arguments. Make that two functions.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Simple test script for the following patch.
btrfs-progs: qgroup: add sync option to 'qgroup show'
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The sync call is unlikely to fail so we optimistically turn it to a
warning if that happens so we return inaccurate numbers instead of a
hard exit.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The value of sort option ('S') is not used for option letter.
Therefore, I'll change the single letter to non-character.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The 'qgroup show' command does not synchronize filesystem.
Therefore, 'qgroup show' may not display the correct value unless
synchronized with 'filesystem sync' command etc.
So add the '--sync' option so that we can choose whether or not
to synchronize when executing the command.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The assertion and warn/bug have reversed condition checks, using the
same helpers drops the exact value, so we'll print the message directly
without the helpers.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We want to pass unmodified condition down to the handlers so we can't
use assert_trace for that purpose.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Due to commit 00e769d04c2c83029d6c71(btrfs-progs: Correct value printed
by assertions/BUG_ON/WARN_ON), which changed the assert_trace()
parameter, the condition passed to assert/WARN_ON/BUG_ON are logical
notted for backtrace enabled and disabled case.
Such behavior makes us easier to pass value wrong, and in fact it did
cause us to pass wrong condition for ASSERT().
Instead of passing different conditions for ASSERT/WARN_ON/BUG_ON()
manually, this patch will use ASSERT() to implement the resting
ASSERT/WARN_ON/BUG() for disable backtrace case, and use assert_trace()
to implement ASSERT() and BUG_ON(), to allow them to print correct
value.
Also, move WARN_ON() out of the ifdef branch, as it's completely the
same for both branches.
Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If we call "btrfs quota rescan -w", it will attempt to start the rescan
operation, wait for it, and then print the "quota rescan started" message.
The wait could last an arbitrary amount of time, so printing it after
the wait isn't very helpful.
This patch reworks how we print the rescan started message as well as the
printing of the messages, including adding an error message for status
query failures (which could be EPERM/EFAULT/ENOMEM, not just no rescan
in progress) and wait failures.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
While performing a memcpy, we are copying from uninitialized dst
as opposed to src->data. Though using eb->len is correct, I used
src->len to make it more readable.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For btrfs-progs test case 021-partially-dropped-snapshot-case, if the
first leaf is already dropped, btrfs check low-memory mode will report
false alert:
checking fs roots
checksum verify failed on 29917184 found E4E3BDB6 wanted 00000000
checksum verify failed on 29917184 found E4E3BDB6 wanted 00000000
checksum verify failed on 29917184 found E4E3BDB6 wanted 00000000
checksum verify failed on 29917184 found E4E3BDB6 wanted 00000000
This is caused by we are calling check_fs_first_inode() function,
unlike the rest part of check_fs_root_v2(), it doesn't have enough check
on dropping progress, and caused the false alert.
Fix it by checking dropping progress before searching slot.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When qgroup show is called on a filesystem that does not have quotas
enabled, the error message is very unclear:
ERROR: can't perform the search - No such file or directory
ERROR: can't list qgroups: No such file or director
Remove the error from low level helper and let the command handler
decide what to print.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
A user reported on IRC that the new 32M default for target extent size
does not work. This happens because if there are no commandline options,
the v1 ioctl is used that does not do any fine grained defrag. As the v2
ioctl has been introduced 6 years ago (2010, kernel 2.6.33) we won't
keep backward compatibility anymore.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The unallocated space is not calculated correctly when a device
deltion/replace is in progress. This appears as huge number, EiB-sized.
It's really a negative number, because we don't have entire information
available and mixing numbers that do and don't take the deleted device
size into account.
We have to query search ioctl to retrieve the missing information, also
this requires root access for the ioctl, so we still need a workaround
for non-root case. Here the negative numbers seem to be a bit more
practical than EiB numbers.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a unit mode that will interpret the input number as a signed 64bit,
optionally and not by default for all numbers.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
I got tired of seeing "16.00EiB" whenever btrfs-progs encounters a
negative size value, e.g. during resize:
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/datamd18 16.00EiB
This version is much more useful:
Unallocated:
/dev/mapper/datamd18 -26.29GiB
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
root->highest_inode is not accurate at the time of creating a lost+found
and it fails because the highest_inode+1 is already present. This could be
because of fixes after highest_inode is set. Instead, search
for the highest inode in the tree and use it for lost+found.
This makes root->highest_inode unnecessary and hence deleted.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Populate fs after convert so we can trigger data chunk allocation.
This can expose too restrict old rollback condition
Reported-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If we specify NO_HOLES incompat feature when converting, the result
image still uses hole file extents.
And further more, the hole is incorrect as its disk_num_bytes is not
zero.
The problem is at btrfs_insert_file_extent() which doesn't check if we
are going to insert hole file extent.
Modify it to skip hole file extents to allow it follow restrict NO_HOLES
flag.
And since no_holes flag can be triggered on half-way, so current fsck
won't report such error, as it consider it as old file holes.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Regression introduced by a2f7af94ab
"btrfs-progs: subvol_uuid_search: return error encoded pointer"
IS_ERR() will only check if it's an error code, won't check if it's
NULL. And for all the caller the commit modifies, it can return NULL
and makes cause segfault.
Fix it by introducing new IS_ERR_OR_NULL() macro, and for NULL pointer
and needs to return int case, convert NULL pointer to -ENOENT.
Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For fs with tree reloc tree(under balancing), lowmem mode will report
false alert like:
ERROR: extent[62914560 4096] backref generation mismatch, wanted: <=9,
have: 13
This is because lowmem mode adds a more restrict check, to ensure
generation in fs tree won't be smaller than extent tree.
In fact such assumption is not right for tree reloc tree, so remove such
check.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
