The format of 'l' option in mkfs.btrfs.txt is wrong.
And, when the head of the character string is 65536, the following warning
is displayed.
$ make
Making all in Documentation
[ASCII] mkfs.btrfs.xml
asciidoc: WARNING: mkfs.btrfs.xml.tmp1: line 67: list item index: expected 1 got 65536
[XMLTO] mkfs.btrfs.8
[GZ] mkfs.btrfs.8.gz
rm mkfs.btrfs.8 mkfs.btrfs.xml
So, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Escape the first quote of two to cancel effects of ordinary '...' .
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Now, if exec:
# btrfs-debug-tree <mount_point>
it echos:
: Superblock bytenr is larger than device size
But it is quite misleading, because it is a valid btrfs.
In this case, we should tell the developer to provide a block device.
After apply:
: '<mount_point>' is not a block device
Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
The check_arg_type() function does quite generic thing, move it to
utils.c.
Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Commit 8be2fff (btrfs-progs: apply realpath for btrfs fi
show when mount point is given) changed the behavior of
btrfs fi show to return an error if the call to realpath()
failed. This broke the ability to specify a filesystem by
uuid or label.
So let's not consider a failed call to realpath() as an
error. If the user really specified a bad device, just
return nothing like we did before.
Signed-off-by: Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
In reset_nlink(), we believe rec->found_link as accurate number of the
valid links. However it only records the number of found DIR_ITEM, so we
can't use it as reliable value.
Before this patch, in some case, leaf corruption recovery will believe
there is a valid backref but don't add_link() since it can't find any
valid one and don't put it into the lost+found dir.
So the recovered inode will be considered as an orphan item without
orphan item and repair_inode_orphan_item() will add orphan item for it,
causing all the filename/filetype we recovered being a waste of time.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
When "/" is Btrfs, "btrfs property <subcommand> /" regards it
as non-root by mistake.
check_is_root() regards @object as a file system root if
the following two conditions are satisfied.
a) Both @object and its parent directory are Btrfs object
(file system root, subvolume, inode, and device
used for Btrfs).
b) fsid of the above mentioned two objects are different.
It doesn't work if @object is "/" because, in this case,
fsid of "/" and its parent (it's also "/"), are the same.
* Test environment
Two Btrfs file system (not subvolume) "/" and "/home/sat/mnt".
* How to reproduce
Submit "btrfs prop get" against the above mentioned file systems.
* Test Result
** Actual result (without my patch)
==========================
ro=false
label= # label is displayed because it's a file system root
ro=false # label is not displayed even if it's a file system root
==========================
** Expected result (with my patch)
==========================
ro=false
label=
ro=false
label=foo # label is displayed
===========================
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Naohiro Aota <naota@elisp.net>
Reviewed-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Same in kernel and matches semantics of free().
Resolves-Coverity-CID: 1054881
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
If the tree's empty, we'll get NULL and dereference it.
Resolves-Coverity-CID: 1248828
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Enhance the document of btrfs property as follows.
- Add the description about the candidates of <name>.
- Enrich the description of <object>.
- Fix typos and some redundancy.
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Naohiro Aota <naota@elisp.net>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Fix the following gcc(>4.9) and clang warning:
In file included from cmds-receive.c:24:
In file included from ./kerncompat.h:22:
In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:27:
/usr/include/features.h:148:3: warning: "_BSD_SOURCE and _SVID_SOURCE
are deprecated, use _DEFAULT_SOURCE" [-W#warnings]
^
1 warning generated.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
When compiled with clang, the following warning is outputted.
disk-io.c:1017:15: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is
always false [-Wtautological-compare]
if (dev_size < 0)
~~~~~~~~ ^ ~
1 warning generated.
This is because dev_size is defined as unsigned type, but lseek() will
return singed valued.
So the judgement will always to false.
Use temporary off_t return value to solve it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Move the linker only option -rdynamic to LDFLAGS.
This resolve lots of the following warning if using clang as CC:
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-rdynamic'
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Disable backtrace and define __always_inline when glibc is not used as
libc. This, together with some header changes allows btrfs-progs to
compile with musl-libc.
Signed-off-by: Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@wizzup.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
This fixes various compilation errors where PATH_MAX and XATTR_SIZE_MAX
were missing. To my knowledge, this should have no bad side effects.
Signed-off-by: Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@wizzup.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
This adds two new test images
1) 008-bad-offset-snapshots. This has a corrupt item with multiple snapshots
pointing to it, to make sure the bad block repair stuff doesn't loop and
actually repairs stuff. It also requires the dir index repair stuff to pass our
built in tests which is why it's not tied to the same commit.
2) 009-bad-dir-index-name.img. This has a corrupt name in a dir index to make
sure our dir index repair stuff is working properly.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
David Sterba
Tsutomu Itoh
Gui Hecheng
Justin Maggard
Qu Wenruo
Satoru Takeuchi
Merlijn Wajer
Josef Bacik