btrfs-progs: fix listing deleted subvolumes
The real check whether to show deleted or live subvolumes was skipped if just '-d' was specified without other filters. The 'deleted' filter was not accounted. It is now handled as a normal filter, that additionally sets the only_delete global status in order to be processed before any other filters in filter_root(). Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4724d7b075
commit
f9f9ee18a5
10
btrfs-list.c
10
btrfs-list.c
|
@ -1216,11 +1216,6 @@ int btrfs_list_setup_filter(struct btrfs_list_filter_set **filter_set,
|
|||
BUG_ON(filter >= BTRFS_LIST_FILTER_MAX);
|
||||
BUG_ON(set->nfilters > set->total);
|
||||
|
||||
if (filter == BTRFS_LIST_FILTER_DELETED) {
|
||||
set->only_deleted = 1;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (set->nfilters == set->total) {
|
||||
size = set->total + BTRFS_LIST_NFILTERS_INCREASE;
|
||||
size = sizeof(*set) + size * sizeof(struct btrfs_list_filter);
|
||||
|
@ -1239,6 +1234,9 @@ int btrfs_list_setup_filter(struct btrfs_list_filter_set **filter_set,
|
|||
|
||||
BUG_ON(set->filters[set->nfilters].filter_func);
|
||||
|
||||
if (filter == BTRFS_LIST_FILTER_DELETED)
|
||||
set->only_deleted = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
set->filters[set->nfilters].filter_func = all_filter_funcs[filter];
|
||||
set->filters[set->nfilters].data = data;
|
||||
set->nfilters++;
|
||||
|
@ -1250,7 +1248,7 @@ static int filter_root(struct root_info *ri,
|
|||
{
|
||||
int i, ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!set || !set->nfilters)
|
||||
if (!set)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (set->only_deleted && !ri->deleted)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue