btrfs-progs: Introduce sectorsize nodesize and stripesize members for

btrfs_fs_info

Just like what we do in kernel, since we will not support different
leaf/node/stripe size per tree, there is no need to store these block
sizes in btrfs_root.

This patch will introduce these block size members into btrfs_fs_info
structure, allowing us to convert such usage in later patches.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
This commit is contained in:
Qu Wenruo 2017-05-17 16:57:35 +08:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 3c7a04e592
commit c4893f15ce
3 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -1475,6 +1475,9 @@ open_ctree_with_broken_chunk(struct recover_control *rc)
}
memcpy(fs_info->fsid, &disk_super->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE);
fs_info->sectorsize = btrfs_super_sectorsize(disk_super);
fs_info->nodesize = btrfs_super_nodesize(disk_super);
fs_info->stripesize = btrfs_super_stripesize(disk_super);
ret = btrfs_check_fs_compatibility(disk_super, OPEN_CTREE_WRITES);
if (ret)

View File

@ -1147,6 +1147,10 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
struct cache_tree *fsck_extent_cache;
struct cache_tree *corrupt_blocks;
/* Cached block sizes */
u32 nodesize;
u32 sectorsize;
u32 stripesize;
};
/*

View File

@ -1327,6 +1327,9 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
}
memcpy(fs_info->fsid, &disk_super->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE);
fs_info->sectorsize = btrfs_super_sectorsize(disk_super);
fs_info->nodesize = btrfs_super_nodesize(disk_super);
fs_info->stripesize = btrfs_super_stripesize(disk_super);
ret = btrfs_check_fs_compatibility(fs_info->super_copy, flags);
if (ret)