mirror of
https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs
synced 2025-02-19 19:26:51 +00:00
btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix regression which screws up extent allocator
[BUG] Commit723427d7e6
("btrfs-progs: check: change the way lowmem mode traverses metadata") introduces a regression which could make some fsck self test case to fail. For fsck test case 004-no-dir-item, btrfs check --mode=lowmem --repair can cause BUG_ON() with ret = -17 (-EEXIST) when committing transaction. The problem happens with the following backtrace: ./btrfs(+0x22045)[0x555d0dade045] ./btrfs(+0x2216f)[0x555d0dade16f] ./btrfs(+0x29df1)[0x555d0dae5df1] ./btrfs(+0x2a142)[0x555d0dae6142] ./btrfs(btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x78)[0x555d0dae6202] ./btrfs(__btrfs_cow_block+0x177)[0x555d0dad00a2] ./btrfs(btrfs_cow_block+0x116)[0x555d0dad05a8] ./btrfs(commit_tree_roots+0x91)[0x555d0db1fd4f] ./btrfs(btrfs_commit_transaction+0x18c)[0x555d0db20100] ./btrfs(btrfs_fix_super_size+0x190)[0x555d0db005a4] ./btrfs(btrfs_fix_device_and_super_size+0x177)[0x555d0db00771] ./btrfs(cmd_check+0x1757)[0x555d0db4f6ab] ./btrfs(main+0x138)[0x555d0dace5dd] /usr/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xea)[0x7fa5e4613f6a] ./btrfs(_start+0x2a)[0x555d0dacddda] The bug is triggered by that, extent allocator considers range [29360128, 29376512) as free and allocates it. However when inserting EXTENT_ITEM, btrfs finds there is already one tree block (fs tree root), returning -EEXIST and causing the later BUG_ON(). [CAUSE] The cause is in repair mode, lowmem check always pins all metadata blocks. However pinned metadata blocks will be unpined when transaction commits, and will be marked as *FREE* space. So later extent allocator will consider such range free and allocates them incorrectly. [FIX] Don't pin metadata blocks without valid reason or preparation (like discard all free space cache to re-calculate free space on next write). Fixes:723427d7e6
("btrfs-progs: check: change the way lowmem mode traverses metadata") Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
86fe5fb2c1
commit
beb06b63cc
10
cmds-check.c
10
cmds-check.c
@ -6623,8 +6623,6 @@ out:
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int pin_metadata_blocks(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Iterate all items in the tree and call check_inode_item() to check.
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -13306,8 +13304,6 @@ out:
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int pin_metadata_blocks(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Low memory usage version check_chunks_and_extents.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -13326,12 +13322,6 @@ static int check_chunks_and_extents_v2(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
|
||||
root = fs_info->fs_root;
|
||||
|
||||
if (repair) {
|
||||
/* pin every tree block to avoid extent overwrite */
|
||||
ret = pin_metadata_blocks(fs_info);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
error("failed to pin metadata blocks");
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
trans = btrfs_start_transaction(fs_info->extent_root, 1);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
|
||||
error("failed to start transaction before check");
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user