mirror of
https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs
synced 2025-05-09 03:17:55 +00:00
btrfs-progs: docs: update system limits texts in sect. 5
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
428bb2e9c2
commit
5121b09519
@ -641,10 +641,11 @@ maximum file name length::
|
||||
|
||||
maximum symlink target length::
|
||||
depends on the 'nodesize' value, for 4k it's 3949 bytes, for larger nodesize
|
||||
it's 4095
|
||||
it's 4095 due to the system limit PATH_MAX
|
||||
+
|
||||
The symlink target may not be a valid path, ie the path name components
|
||||
can exceed the limits, there's no content validation at `symlink`(3) creation.
|
||||
The symlink target may not be a valid path, ie. the path name components
|
||||
can exceed the limits (NAME_MAX), there's no content validation at `symlink`(3)
|
||||
creation.
|
||||
|
||||
maximum number of inodes::
|
||||
2^64^ but depends on the available metadata space as the inodes are created
|
||||
@ -657,9 +658,9 @@ maximum file length::
|
||||
inherent limit of btrfs is 2^64^ (16 EiB) but the linux VFS limit is 2^63^ (8 EiB)
|
||||
|
||||
maximum number of subvolumes::
|
||||
2^64^ but depends on the available metadata space, the space consumed by all
|
||||
subvolume metadata includes bookkeeping of the shared extents can be large (MiB,
|
||||
GiB)
|
||||
the subvolume ids can go up to 2^64^ but the number of actual subvolumes
|
||||
depends on the available metadata space, the space consumed by all subvolume
|
||||
metadata includes bookkeeping of shared extents can be large (MiB, GiB)
|
||||
|
||||
maximum number of hardlinks of a file in a directory::
|
||||
65536 when the `extref` feature is turned on during mkfs (default), roughly
|
||||
@ -727,6 +728,7 @@ When set on a directory, all newly created files will inherit this attribute.
|
||||
No other attributes are supported. For the complete list please refer to the
|
||||
`chattr`(1) manual page.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
CONTROL DEVICE
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
@ -758,6 +760,7 @@ The control device is not strictly required but the device scanning will not
|
||||
work and a workaround would need to be used to mount a multi-device filesystem.
|
||||
The mount option 'device' can trigger the device scanning during mount.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SEE ALSO
|
||||
--------
|
||||
`acl`(5),
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user