RepoMirrors
/
btrfs-progs
mirror of https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

btrfs-progs: provide better error message for raid profile mismatch 

Current error messages are like following:
  Error: unable to create FS with metadata profile 32 (have 2 devices)
  Error: unable to create FS with metadata profile 256 (have 2 devices)

Obviously it is hard for users to interpret "profile XX" to proper
meaning, such as "raidN". So use recongizable string instead of
internal numerical value. In case of "DUP", use an explicit message.

Plus this patch fix a bug that message mistake metadata profile
for data profile.

After applying this patch, messages will be like:
  Error: DUP is not allowed when FS have multiple devices
  Error: unable to create FS with metadata profile RAID6 (have 2
  devices but 3 devices are required)

Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:
Hidetoshi Seto 2014-05-16 17:20:56 +09:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 3ab60c6a62
commit 373110d84f
1 changed files with 35 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

41
utils.c
View File

@ -2084,6 +2084,25 @@ out:
return ret;
}
static int group_profile_devs_min(u64 flag)
{
switch (flag & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) {
case 0: /* single */
case BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP:
return 1;
case BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0:
case BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1:
case BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5:
return 2;
case BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6:
return 3;
case BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10:
return 4;
default:
return -1;
}
}
int test_num_disk_vs_raid(u64 metadata_profile, u64 data_profile,
u64 dev_cnt, int mixed, char *estr)
{
@ -2104,16 +2123,26 @@ int test_num_disk_vs_raid(u64 metadata_profile, u64 data_profile,
allowed |= BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP;
}
if (dev_cnt > 1 &&
((metadata_profile | data_profile) & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP)) {
snprintf(estr, sz,
"DUP is not allowed when FS has multiple devices\n");
return 1;
}
if (metadata_profile & ~allowed) {
snprintf(estr, sz, "unable to create FS with metadata "
"profile %llu (have %llu devices)\n",
metadata_profile, dev_cnt);
snprintf(estr, sz,
"unable to create FS with metadata profile %s "
"(have %llu devices but %d devices are required)\n",
btrfs_group_profile_str(metadata_profile), dev_cnt,
group_profile_devs_min(metadata_profile));
return 1;
}
if (data_profile & ~allowed) {
snprintf(estr, sz, "unable to create FS with data "
"profile %llu (have %llu devices)\n",
metadata_profile, dev_cnt);
snprintf(estr, sz,
"unable to create FS with data profile %s "
"(have %llu devices but %d devices are required)\n",
btrfs_group_profile_str(data_profile), dev_cnt,
group_profile_devs_min(data_profile));
return 1;
}