diff --git a/tests/fsck-tests/061-out-of-order-inline-backref/btrfs_image.img.xz b/tests/fsck-tests/061-out-of-order-inline-backref/btrfs_image.img.xz
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..65c10617
Binary files /dev/null and b/tests/fsck-tests/061-out-of-order-inline-backref/btrfs_image.img.xz differ
diff --git a/tests/fsck-tests/061-out-of-order-inline-backref/test.sh b/tests/fsck-tests/061-out-of-order-inline-backref/test.sh
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..f80d58f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/fsck-tests/061-out-of-order-inline-backref/test.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+#
+# Verify that check can detect out-of-order inline backref items.
+#
+# There is a report that one ntfs2btrfs generated some out-of-order inline
+# backref items, while btrfs-check failed to detect it at all.
+#
+# Make sure btrfs check can at least detect such error.
+
+source "$TEST_TOP/common"
+
+check_prereq btrfs
+
+check_image() {
+	run_mustfail "out-of-order inline backref items not detected" \
+		"$TOP/btrfs" check "$1"
+}
+
+check_all_images