This is basically a "political decision" and I do not make exceptions .. except when I do!
There are 23 mentions of HTTP in the Readme.md and they stay until I found a reliable alternatives, the reason why they are still on the list is that there are no secure alternatives or no alternatives at all.
Why de-list HTTP pages in the first place?
I keep it short:
- Quality over quantity (we have enough secure alternatives [in most cases])
- Speed reasons, modern pages and encryption methods loading faster.
- Security reasons
- You get a certificate for free e.g. via Let's Encrypt, so think about it.. Why is someone not going to secure his own domain/website? If you cannot even secure your page then please think about the quality of their releases and their true intention why the website was created in the first place (maybe just to get clicks, fame, fake website etc). There are exceptions like libgen and firtgirl (only some examples), they are trusted by a lot of people but still getting de-listed. I believe pointing the finger on them might force them to change their website and call them out. People might now start asking the right question.
The cleanup will continue over the following weeks, the goal would be to only list secure, open source & reliable + trusted websites/tools & scripts from more or less trusted websites that are monitored by lots of people.
It does not matter if you only show the watermark 1 second or 10 minutes. You can use a picture to promote yourself provided in the torrent but there is never a reason to watermark a release....
Some forums added
Some more telegram channels and bots added
Mirror corrections
> Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away
XMPP is dead and not "secure". Don't try to put the ghost back into it's bottle.
XMPP does not even (not even via RFC) support encrypted group chats nor file transfers, don't troll people with "it's like signal or wire". It's not!
> "Blah blah fucking blah!"
Some linked websites are legit:
mkvcage.ws
mkvcage.tv
mkvcage.site
mkvcage.best
... however they are banned because there is no verification who is really behind those pages. I doubt that these are the same persons because some routes are coming from RU, FR or DE. They are coming from different origins, e.g. CityTelkom is RU whole e-si.fr is FR. This is not from the same person/group created. I doubt that someone is stupid enough using CityTelekom RU as route, they are well-known to sell you out.
* CityTelekom LLC, Armavir https://city-telekom.ru/
* https://anycast.io
* https://www.e-si.fr
IPv4 routes:
176.32.128.0
80.83.184.0
185.141.4.0
176.32.128.0
176.32.128.0
IPv6 routes (anycast.io)
2001:4ce9::2001:4ce9:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
2001:4cea::2001:4cea:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
2001:4cec::2001:4cec:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
2001:4cee::2001:4cee:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
2a07:a905:ffe8::2a07:a905:ffe8:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
- Slow download speed (no CDN for none vietnamese users)
- Learn some basics first before you create a website/app, e.g. what a proxy/VPN is, the difference and how they work.
- Ads (for US/EU people)