Libav seems rather dead: no release for 2 years, no new git commits in
master for almost a year (with one exception ~6 months ago). From what I
can tell, some developers resigned themselves to the horrifying idea to
post patches to ffmpeg-devel instead, while the rest of the developers
went on to greener pastures.
Libav was a better project than FFmpeg. Unfortunately, FFmpeg won,
because it managed to keep the name and website. Libav was pushed more
and more into obscurity: while there was initially a big push for Libav,
FFmpeg just remained "in place" and visible for most people. FFmpeg was
slowly draining all manpower and energy from Libav. A big part of this
was that FFmpeg stole code from Libav (regular merges of the entire
Libav git tree), making it some sort of Frankenstein mirror of Libav,
think decaying zombie with additional legs ("features") nailed to it.
"Stealing" surely is the wrong word; I'm just aping the language that
some of the FFmpeg members used to use. All that is in the past now, I'm
probably the only person left who is annoyed by this, and with this
commit I'm putting this decade long problem finally to an end. I just
thought I'd express my annoyance about this fucking shitshow one last
time.
The most intrusive change in this commit is the resample filter, which
originally used libavresample. Since the FFmpeg developer refused to
enable libavresample by default for drama reasons, and the API was
slightly different, so the filter used some big preprocessor mess to
make it compatible to libswresample. All that falls away now. The
simplification to the build system is also significant.
Although this was sort of elegant, it just seems to complicate things
slightly. Originally, the API meant that you cache mp_recorder_sink
yourself (which would avoid the mess of passing an index around), but
that too seems slightly roundabout.
In a later change, I want to change the set of streams passed to
mp_recorder_create(), and then I'd have to keep track of the index for
each stream, which would suck. With this commit, I can just pass the
unambiguous sh_stream to it, and it will be guaranteed to match the
correct stream.
The disadvantages are barely worth discussing. It's a new linear search
per packet, but usually only 2 to 4 streams are active at a time. Also,
in theory a user could want to write 2 streams using the same sh_stream
(same metadata, just writing different packets or so), but in practice
this is never done.
This is the muxer used by all 3 stream recording features (why are there
so many?). It tried hard to avoid writing broken files. In particular,
it buffered packets until it new there was a keyframe packet (which, in
mpv's/FFmpeg's definition, mean seek points from which decoding can
resume), or final EOF. The danger that was probably considered here was
that due to video frame reordering, not muxing some trailing, missing
packets of a keyframe range could lead to broken decoding or skipped
frames, so better discard packets belonging to an incomplete range.
Sounds like a good idea so far.
Unfortunately, this will drop an entire keyframe range even if the
current packet run is complete and mp_recorder_mark_discontinuity() is
called, simply because recorder.c can not know that the next packet
would have been a keyframe.
It seems better to mux all packets to avoid losing valid data, even if
it means that sometimes packets/frames will be missing from the file. It
benefits especially the dump-cache command, which will call the function
to signal a discontinuity after every range. Before this commit, it
discarded the last packets, even if they were perfectly fine.
(An alternative solution for dump-cache would have been a second
discontinuity marker function, that communicates that the current packet
range is complete. But this commit's solution is simpler and overall
more robust, at the danger of producing more semi-broken files.)
This may make some of the complex buffering/waiting logic in recorder.c
pointless.
Untested (in this final form).
These macros explicitly honor MP_NOPTS_VALUE, instead of implicitly
relying on the fact that this value is the lowest allowed value.
In addition, this changes one case to use MP_NOPTS_VALUE instead of
INFINITY, also a cosmetic change.
--record-file is nice, but only sometimes. If you watch some sort of
livestream which you want to record, it's actually much nicer not to
record what you're currently "seeing", but anything you're receiving.
wm4
Nicolas F