Copyright: mention that more liberal licenses are ok too

In fact, some source files do this.
This commit is contained in:
wm4 2015-07-26 20:23:41 +02:00
parent 68d5e7a986
commit 77a9265561
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ All new contributions must be LGPLv2.1+ licensed, or if the changes are done on
GPL code, must come with the implicit agreement that the project can relicense GPL code, must come with the implicit agreement that the project can relicense
the code to LGPLv2.1+ at a later point without asking the contributor. (This the code to LGPLv2.1+ at a later point without asking the contributor. (This
is a safeguard for making potential relicensing of the project to LGPLv2.1+ is a safeguard for making potential relicensing of the project to LGPLv2.1+
easier.) easier.) Using a more liberal license compatible to LGPLv2.1+ is also ok.
For information about authors and contributors, consult the git log, which For information about authors and contributors, consult the git log, which
contains the complete SVN and CVS history as well. contains the complete SVN and CVS history as well.