From 166548ba36be347af69655782ab16e6faeb4f0c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: gabucino <gabucino@b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 22:26:47 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] info about gcc 2.96 and lame

git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@2935 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2
---
 DOCS/users_against_developers.html | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/DOCS/users_against_developers.html b/DOCS/users_against_developers.html
index f2c769783f..f792cefdeb 100644
--- a/DOCS/users_against_developers.html
+++ b/DOCS/users_against_developers.html
@@ -33,8 +33,9 @@ achieves this by having overoptimized MMX/SSE/3DNow/etc codes, fastmemcpy, and
 lots of other features. <B>MPlayer</B> contained MMX/3DNow instructions in a
 syntax that all Linux compilers accept it... except RedHat's GCC (it's more
 standard compliant). It simply <B><I>skips</I></B> them. It doesn't give
-errors. It doesn't give warnings. But hey, it compiles bash on s390 and
-IA64.</P>
+errors. It doesn't give warnings. <B>And</B>, there is Lame. With gcc 2.96, its quality check
+(<CODE>make test</CODE> after compiling) <I>doesn't even run !!!</I>
+But hey, it compiles bash on s390 and IA64.</P>
 
 <P>The <I>statements</I> : most developers around the world begun having
 bad feelings about RedHat's GCC 2.96 , and told their RedHat users to