mpv/video/out/vulkan/context_xlib.c

118 lines
3.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

vo_gpu: vulkan: initial implementation This time based on ra/vo_gpu. 2017 is the year of the vulkan desktop! Current problems / limitations / improvement opportunities: 1. The swapchain/flipping code violates the vulkan spec, by assuming that the presentation queue will be bounded (in cases where rendering is significantly faster than vsync). But apparently, there's simply no better way to do this right now, to the point where even the stupid cube.c examples from LunarG etc. do it wrong. (cf. https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-Docs/issues/370) 2. The memory allocator could be improved. (This is a universal constant) 3. Could explore using push descriptors instead of descriptor sets, especially since we expect to switch descriptors semi-often for some passes (like interpolation). Probably won't make a difference, but the synchronization overhead might be a factor. Who knows. 4. Parallelism across frames / async transfer is not well-defined, we either need to use a better semaphore / command buffer strategy or a resource pooling layer to safely handle cross-frame parallelism. (That said, I gave resource pooling a try and was not happy with the result at all - so I'm still exploring the semaphore strategy) 5. We aggressively use pipeline barriers where events would offer a much more fine-grained synchronization mechanism. As a result of this, we might be suffering from GPU bubbles due to too-short dependencies on objects. (That said, I'm also exploring the use of semaphores as a an ordering tactic which would allow cross-frame time slicing in theory) Some minor changes to the vo_gpu and infrastructure, but nothing consequential. NOTE: For safety, all use of asynchronous commands / multiple command pools is currently disabled completely. There are some left-over relics of this in the code (e.g. the distinction between dev_poll and pool_poll), but that is kept in place mostly because this will be re-extended in the future (vulkan rev 2). The queue count is also currently capped to 1, because of the lack of cross-frame semaphores means we need the implicit synchronization from the same-queue semantics to guarantee a correct result.
2016-09-14 18:54:18 +00:00
/*
* This file is part of mpv.
*
* mpv is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* mpv is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with mpv. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#include "video/out/gpu/context.h"
#include "video/out/x11_common.h"
#include "common.h"
#include "context.h"
#include "utils.h"
struct priv {
struct mpvk_ctx vk;
};
static void xlib_uninit(struct ra_ctx *ctx)
{
struct priv *p = ctx->priv;
ra_vk_ctx_uninit(ctx);
mpvk_uninit(&p->vk);
vo_x11_uninit(ctx->vo);
}
static bool xlib_init(struct ra_ctx *ctx)
{
struct priv *p = ctx->priv = talloc_zero(ctx, struct priv);
struct mpvk_ctx *vk = &p->vk;
int msgl = ctx->opts.probing ? MSGL_V : MSGL_ERR;
if (!mpvk_instance_init(vk, ctx->log, VK_KHR_XLIB_SURFACE_EXTENSION_NAME,
ctx->opts.debug))
vo_gpu: vulkan: initial implementation This time based on ra/vo_gpu. 2017 is the year of the vulkan desktop! Current problems / limitations / improvement opportunities: 1. The swapchain/flipping code violates the vulkan spec, by assuming that the presentation queue will be bounded (in cases where rendering is significantly faster than vsync). But apparently, there's simply no better way to do this right now, to the point where even the stupid cube.c examples from LunarG etc. do it wrong. (cf. https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-Docs/issues/370) 2. The memory allocator could be improved. (This is a universal constant) 3. Could explore using push descriptors instead of descriptor sets, especially since we expect to switch descriptors semi-often for some passes (like interpolation). Probably won't make a difference, but the synchronization overhead might be a factor. Who knows. 4. Parallelism across frames / async transfer is not well-defined, we either need to use a better semaphore / command buffer strategy or a resource pooling layer to safely handle cross-frame parallelism. (That said, I gave resource pooling a try and was not happy with the result at all - so I'm still exploring the semaphore strategy) 5. We aggressively use pipeline barriers where events would offer a much more fine-grained synchronization mechanism. As a result of this, we might be suffering from GPU bubbles due to too-short dependencies on objects. (That said, I'm also exploring the use of semaphores as a an ordering tactic which would allow cross-frame time slicing in theory) Some minor changes to the vo_gpu and infrastructure, but nothing consequential. NOTE: For safety, all use of asynchronous commands / multiple command pools is currently disabled completely. There are some left-over relics of this in the code (e.g. the distinction between dev_poll and pool_poll), but that is kept in place mostly because this will be re-extended in the future (vulkan rev 2). The queue count is also currently capped to 1, because of the lack of cross-frame semaphores means we need the implicit synchronization from the same-queue semantics to guarantee a correct result.
2016-09-14 18:54:18 +00:00
goto error;
if (!vo_x11_init(ctx->vo))
vo_gpu: vulkan: initial implementation This time based on ra/vo_gpu. 2017 is the year of the vulkan desktop! Current problems / limitations / improvement opportunities: 1. The swapchain/flipping code violates the vulkan spec, by assuming that the presentation queue will be bounded (in cases where rendering is significantly faster than vsync). But apparently, there's simply no better way to do this right now, to the point where even the stupid cube.c examples from LunarG etc. do it wrong. (cf. https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-Docs/issues/370) 2. The memory allocator could be improved. (This is a universal constant) 3. Could explore using push descriptors instead of descriptor sets, especially since we expect to switch descriptors semi-often for some passes (like interpolation). Probably won't make a difference, but the synchronization overhead might be a factor. Who knows. 4. Parallelism across frames / async transfer is not well-defined, we either need to use a better semaphore / command buffer strategy or a resource pooling layer to safely handle cross-frame parallelism. (That said, I gave resource pooling a try and was not happy with the result at all - so I'm still exploring the semaphore strategy) 5. We aggressively use pipeline barriers where events would offer a much more fine-grained synchronization mechanism. As a result of this, we might be suffering from GPU bubbles due to too-short dependencies on objects. (That said, I'm also exploring the use of semaphores as a an ordering tactic which would allow cross-frame time slicing in theory) Some minor changes to the vo_gpu and infrastructure, but nothing consequential. NOTE: For safety, all use of asynchronous commands / multiple command pools is currently disabled completely. There are some left-over relics of this in the code (e.g. the distinction between dev_poll and pool_poll), but that is kept in place mostly because this will be re-extended in the future (vulkan rev 2). The queue count is also currently capped to 1, because of the lack of cross-frame semaphores means we need the implicit synchronization from the same-queue semantics to guarantee a correct result.
2016-09-14 18:54:18 +00:00
goto error;
if (!vo_x11_create_vo_window(ctx->vo, NULL, "mpvk"))
vo_gpu: vulkan: initial implementation This time based on ra/vo_gpu. 2017 is the year of the vulkan desktop! Current problems / limitations / improvement opportunities: 1. The swapchain/flipping code violates the vulkan spec, by assuming that the presentation queue will be bounded (in cases where rendering is significantly faster than vsync). But apparently, there's simply no better way to do this right now, to the point where even the stupid cube.c examples from LunarG etc. do it wrong. (cf. https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-Docs/issues/370) 2. The memory allocator could be improved. (This is a universal constant) 3. Could explore using push descriptors instead of descriptor sets, especially since we expect to switch descriptors semi-often for some passes (like interpolation). Probably won't make a difference, but the synchronization overhead might be a factor. Who knows. 4. Parallelism across frames / async transfer is not well-defined, we either need to use a better semaphore / command buffer strategy or a resource pooling layer to safely handle cross-frame parallelism. (That said, I gave resource pooling a try and was not happy with the result at all - so I'm still exploring the semaphore strategy) 5. We aggressively use pipeline barriers where events would offer a much more fine-grained synchronization mechanism. As a result of this, we might be suffering from GPU bubbles due to too-short dependencies on objects. (That said, I'm also exploring the use of semaphores as a an ordering tactic which would allow cross-frame time slicing in theory) Some minor changes to the vo_gpu and infrastructure, but nothing consequential. NOTE: For safety, all use of asynchronous commands / multiple command pools is currently disabled completely. There are some left-over relics of this in the code (e.g. the distinction between dev_poll and pool_poll), but that is kept in place mostly because this will be re-extended in the future (vulkan rev 2). The queue count is also currently capped to 1, because of the lack of cross-frame semaphores means we need the implicit synchronization from the same-queue semantics to guarantee a correct result.
2016-09-14 18:54:18 +00:00
goto error;
VkXlibSurfaceCreateInfoKHR xinfo = {
.sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_XLIB_SURFACE_CREATE_INFO_KHR,
.dpy = ctx->vo->x11->display,
.window = ctx->vo->x11->window,
};
VkResult res = vkCreateXlibSurfaceKHR(vk->inst, &xinfo, MPVK_ALLOCATOR,
&vk->surf);
if (res != VK_SUCCESS) {
MP_MSG(ctx, msgl, "Failed creating Xlib surface: %s\n", vk_err(res));
goto error;
}
if (!ra_vk_ctx_init(ctx, vk, VK_PRESENT_MODE_FIFO_KHR))
goto error;
return true;
error:
xlib_uninit(ctx);
return false;
}
static bool resize(struct ra_ctx *ctx)
{
return ra_vk_ctx_resize(ctx->swapchain, ctx->vo->dwidth, ctx->vo->dheight);
}
static bool xlib_reconfig(struct ra_ctx *ctx)
{
vo_x11_config_vo_window(ctx->vo);
return resize(ctx);
}
static int xlib_control(struct ra_ctx *ctx, int *events, int request, void *arg)
{
int ret = vo_x11_control(ctx->vo, events, request, arg);
if (*events & VO_EVENT_RESIZE) {
if (!resize(ctx))
return VO_ERROR;
}
return ret;
}
static void xlib_wakeup(struct ra_ctx *ctx)
{
vo_x11_wakeup(ctx->vo);
}
static void xlib_wait_events(struct ra_ctx *ctx, int64_t until_time_us)
{
vo_x11_wait_events(ctx->vo, until_time_us);
}
const struct ra_ctx_fns ra_ctx_vulkan_xlib = {
.type = "vulkan",
vo_gpu: semi-fix --gpu-context/--gpu-api options and help output This was confusing at best. Change it to output the actual choices. (Seems like in the end it's always me who has to clean up other people's bullshit.) Context names were not unique - but they should be, so fix it. The whole point of the original --opengl-backend option was to side-step the tricky auto-detection, so you know exactly what you get. The goal of this commit is to make --gpu-context work the same way. Fix the non-unique names by appending "vk" to the names. Keep in mind that this was not suitable for slecting the "UI" backend anyway, since "x11" would force GLX, whereas people on not-NVIDIA actually want "x11egl". Users trying to use --gpu-context=x11 to force the X11 backend would always end up with GLX, which would at least break VAAPI hardware decoding for them. Basically the idea that this option could select the "UI" type is completely broken - it selects an implementation, which implies a UI. Selecting the UI type This would require a separate mechanism. (Although in theory this separate mechanism could be part of the --gpu-context option - in any case, someone would have to implement it.) To achieve help output that can actually be understood, just duplicate the code. Most of that code is duplicated anyway, and trying to share just the list code with the result of making the output unreadable doesn't make too much sense. If we wanted to save code/effort, we could just remove the help output altogether. --gpu-api has non-unique entries, and it would be nice to group them (e.g. list all OpenGL capable contexts with "opengl"), but C makes this simple idea too much of a pain, so don't do it. Also remove a stray tab from the android entry on the manpage.
2017-10-16 08:53:33 +00:00
.name = "x11vk",
vo_gpu: vulkan: initial implementation This time based on ra/vo_gpu. 2017 is the year of the vulkan desktop! Current problems / limitations / improvement opportunities: 1. The swapchain/flipping code violates the vulkan spec, by assuming that the presentation queue will be bounded (in cases where rendering is significantly faster than vsync). But apparently, there's simply no better way to do this right now, to the point where even the stupid cube.c examples from LunarG etc. do it wrong. (cf. https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-Docs/issues/370) 2. The memory allocator could be improved. (This is a universal constant) 3. Could explore using push descriptors instead of descriptor sets, especially since we expect to switch descriptors semi-often for some passes (like interpolation). Probably won't make a difference, but the synchronization overhead might be a factor. Who knows. 4. Parallelism across frames / async transfer is not well-defined, we either need to use a better semaphore / command buffer strategy or a resource pooling layer to safely handle cross-frame parallelism. (That said, I gave resource pooling a try and was not happy with the result at all - so I'm still exploring the semaphore strategy) 5. We aggressively use pipeline barriers where events would offer a much more fine-grained synchronization mechanism. As a result of this, we might be suffering from GPU bubbles due to too-short dependencies on objects. (That said, I'm also exploring the use of semaphores as a an ordering tactic which would allow cross-frame time slicing in theory) Some minor changes to the vo_gpu and infrastructure, but nothing consequential. NOTE: For safety, all use of asynchronous commands / multiple command pools is currently disabled completely. There are some left-over relics of this in the code (e.g. the distinction between dev_poll and pool_poll), but that is kept in place mostly because this will be re-extended in the future (vulkan rev 2). The queue count is also currently capped to 1, because of the lack of cross-frame semaphores means we need the implicit synchronization from the same-queue semantics to guarantee a correct result.
2016-09-14 18:54:18 +00:00
.reconfig = xlib_reconfig,
.control = xlib_control,
.wakeup = xlib_wakeup,
.wait_events = xlib_wait_events,
.init = xlib_init,
.uninit = xlib_uninit,
};