From cf7f2b16ddb66c82e09f915ffcb4fe645d0d36c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Niedermayer Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:22:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] note about our speed with replying to patches Originally committed as revision 3442 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk --- doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi index 5241c28fda..e554ead8b5 100644 --- a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi +++ b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi @@ -1047,6 +1047,9 @@ It also helps quite a bit if you tell us what the patch does (for example 'replaces lrint by lrintf') , and why (for example '*bsd isnt c99 compliant and has no lrint()') +We reply to all patches submitted and either apply or reject with some +explanation why, but sometimes we are quite busy so it can take a week or 2 + @section Regression tests Before submitting a patch (or committing with CVS), you should at least